Showing posts with label EPA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EPA. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2015



By Alex Swoyer, Sep 01, 2015 Breitbart

A veteran who previously spoke to Breitbart News about being stonewalled by the Department of Defense on his Freedom of Information Act requests has now filed a lawsuit to get information about toxic contamination at Fort McClellan, by which hundreds of thousands of veterans may have been exposed.

Raymond Pulliam – a 53-year-old veteran – had to retire in 2012 due to health issues that he thinks were caused by toxic chemicals he was exposed to during his basic training at Fort McClellan in Alabama. As Breitbart News previously reported, Pulliam “has sought information about Fort McClellan’s chemical contamination from the Department of Defense since last year, but his Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request has gone unanswered.”

According to the complaint, Pulliam, the Plaintiff, is suing the Department of Defense, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the United States Department of Justice “in failing to provide Plaintiff with all non-exempt records responsive to his FOIA requests sent to each of these federal agencies, seeking records regarding their investigation into toxic contamination at former U.S. Army base Fort McClellan.”

Read More: http://www.breitbart.com



J
oin us - become an Elderado today at: LarryElder.com  

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Friday, June 5, 2015

EPA: Fracking Not Causing Major Harm To Drinking Water

By Timothy Cama, Jun. 4, 2015, The Hill

Hydraulic fracturing has not caused any major harm to drinking water supplies, the Environmental Protection Agency concluded Thursday.

In what the EPA is calling the most comprehensive examination of existing data and science on the impact the controversial oil and natural gas drilling technique has on drinking water, it largely debunked concerns about extensive contamination of well water or other sources.

And while the draft report released Thursday is largely a win for industry, which has said for years that fracking is completely safe, the EPA recognized some “potential vulnerabilities in the water lifecycle that could impact drinking water.”

“EPA’s draft assessment will give state regulators, tribes and local communities and industry around the country a critical resource to identify how best to protect public health and their drinking water resources,” Thomas A. Burke, an EPA science adviser and top official in its research office, said in a statement.

“It is the most complete compilation of scientific data to date, including over 950 sources of information, published papers, numerous technical reports, information from stakeholders and peer-reviewed EPA scientific reports,” he said.


Read the full story: www.thehill.com

Join us - become an Elderado today at: LarryElder.com 

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
Harvard, Syracuse Researchers Caught Lying To Boost Obama Climate Rules

By Steve Milloy, Jun. 4, 2015, Breitbart

E-mails obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency show that Harvard University, Syracuse University and two of their researchers appear to have falsely claimed a study supporting EPA’s upcoming global warming rules was conducted “independent(ly)” of the agency.

In early May, a study published in the journal Nature Climate Change purported to support a key EPA claim about its forthcoming global warming rules aimed at coal-fired power plants. The New York Times’ headline, “EPA Emissions Plan Will Save Thousands of Lives, Study Finds,” typified the media coverage.

Across the media, the authors were innocuously described as simply university-affiliated “researchers.” After all, the researchers had declared they had “no competing financial interests” in their study. Both universities had issued media releases heralding the study as the “first independent, peer-reviewed paper of its kind.”


Read the full story: www.breitbart.com

Join us - become an Elderado today at: LarryElder.com 

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Inhofe Calls Obama’s Climate Agenda A ‘Wealth Redistribution Scheme’

Michael Bastasch, Jan. 21, 2015, Daily Caller

”As The Wall Street Journal put it when reporting on just one of the president’s many climate regulations, this is a wealth redistribution scheme being imposed by the president through the EPA.”

“This is the real climate agenda the president chose not to address tonight. It is no wonder because it would impose the largest tax increase in the history of America,” Inhofe added.

Read more: www.dailycaller.com


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Thursday, December 4, 2014

EPA Staffers Linked To 'Alleged Serious Misconduct,' Agency Reveals

George Russell, Dec. 2, 2014, Fox News

Eight Environmental Protection Agency employees who racked up a total of more than ten years’ worth of paid “administrative leave” between 2011 and 2014 -- valued at more than $1,096,000 -- apparently did so because they were involved in “cases of alleged serious misconduct,” Fox News has learned.

Read more: www.foxnews.com



Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Sunday, November 30, 2014

Just How Badly Did The EPA Underestimate The Cost Of Their New Regulations?

Jazz Shaw, Nov. 29, 2014, Hot Air

When Barack Obama’s EPA announced their new carbon restrictions for power plants, they were quick to try to undercut arguments from coal state politicians who predicted staggering costs which would be passed on to consumers. While their own, initial estimates were not accepted by anyone of repute, they had outlets like NPR going out and saying that compliance with the crushing regulations would actually wind up producing a net cost benefit of as much as $67B.

Read more: www.hotair.com



Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Thursday, June 5, 2014

By Donald Lambro, Jun. 4, 2014, Townhall.com

WASHINGTON - Just when our economy is shrinking, President Obama wants to impose harsh environmental rules that will kill jobs, raise energy costs and impose new burdens on business.

One week after the government said the U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter, for the first time since 2011, Obama is calling for severe new coal emissions rules that many Democrats in Congress say will hurt their states and its economies.

They will result in widespread job losses with estimates of up to half a million workers, and likely much more than that if the new rules are fully adopted. Those jobs would come, first and foremost, from coal-mining states, but also from many industries that are heavily dependent on coal for their energy needs.

Nearly 20 states obtain more than half their electric power from coal-fired plants, according to the Energy Information Administration. The Chamber of Commerce says EPA's emission rules would cost businesses more than $50 billion.

The Environmental Protection Agency's new rules have infuriated Democrats in major coal-producing states, many of whom are facing tough elections this year at a critical time when Republicans are close to winning the six seats needed to take control of the Senate.

A typical example of the anger the EPA rules have sparked came from West Virginia's Democratic Secretary of State Natalie Tennant who's running for an open Senate seat. She promised voters Monday that she would "stand up" to Obama and EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy "and anyone else who tries to undermine our coal jobs."

Similar criticism came from Kentucky Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes who is in a tight race to unseat Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell in another pivotal coal state.

McConnell is attacking Grimes for accepting a $2,000 contribution from the president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, a leading backer of EPA stricter rules.

West Virginia Rep. Nick J. Rahall II, one of the GOP's chief targets this fall, says he will introduce legislation to block the EPA rules. And no doubt will be supported by a number of Democrats from coal states across the country, not to mention every Republican on Capitol Hill.

The legislative battle is shaping up to be a replay of Obama's doomed "cap and trade" clean energy proposal in his first term. That bill never saw the light of day, largely because of opposition from coal state Democrats.

The Republicans lost no time this week in mounting a barrage of automated calls against vulnerable Democratic senators seeking re-election in key, battleground states, including Alaska, Louisiana, Virginia, and Colorado.

Read the full story: www.townhall.com


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Wednesday, March 12, 2014


Americans For Tax Reform By Justin Sykes 
A report released by the Environmental Protection Agency’s Inspector General has found that EPA employees have improperly used federal charge cards to purchase everything from gym memberships to gift cards. The report indicated that over 90 percent of the sampled transactions were for prohibited, improper, or erroneous purchases, all paid for by American taxpayers. Ironically, Senate Democrats Monday night carried on an all-night filibuster in the hopes of generating even more power and funding for the EPA.
In order to compile the report, the Office of the Inspector General obtained a spreadsheet of 67,000 EPA transactions from Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, and randomly selected 69 transactions. They additionally selected 11 transactions that seemed inappropriate because of the name of the merchant involved. For instance, some transactions were with merchants listed as dance halls, child care organizations, music venues and theatres. Of the 80 transactions sampled, 75 were for prohibited, improper, or erroneous purchases. The 80 transactions sampled totaled $152,602 and $79,254 (52%) of which were for prohibited, improper, or erroneous purchases.
The report outlined nine specific internal control oversight issues, ranging from the approval of prohibited transactions by EPA officials to the outright failure to maintain transaction records. Of the primary internal control oversight issues, four were particularly outrageous, and the report found that of the transactions sampled:
1.35% of cardholders did not verify the receipt of purchases;
2.30% of cardholders did not obtain required approval prior for purchases;
3.25% of cardholders did not obtain funding prior to purchases; and
4.18% of approving officials never reviewed purchase logs.

Read the full story:  www.atr.org

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"LIke" Larry Elder on Facebook