Showing posts with label Minimum Wage Increase. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Minimum Wage Increase. Show all posts

Friday, June 5, 2015

By Larry Elder, Jun. 3, 2015, Investor's Business Daily

Minimum-wage and other New Deal policies, according to Cato's Jim Powell, cost jobs:

"The flagship of the New Deal was the National Industrial Recovery Act, passed in June 1933. It authorized the president to issue executive orders establishing some 700 industrial cartels, which restricted output and forced wages and prices above market levels.

"The minimum-wage regulations made it illegal for employers to hire people who weren't worth the minimum because they lacked skills. As a result, some 500,000 blacks, particularly in the South, were estimated to have lost their jobs."

Today's push for a higher minimum wage occurs as the supposed "pay gap" between male and female millennials now approaches extinction. Pew Research Center says:

"Today's young women are the first in modern history to start their work lives at near parity with men. In 2012, among workers ages 25 to 34, women's hourly earnings were 93% those of men. ... And women in the younger age cohort were significantly more likely than their male counterparts to have completed a bachelor's degree — 38% versus 31% in 2013."

Two years ago, Elissa Shevinsky, described as a "social justice warrior," complained about "sexism" in high-tech industries. She argued for policies to encourage more women in tech.

But Shevinsky later had an epiphany: "I think the more important meaning is to actively choose a path that's yours — for women to create their own companies and their own infrastructures, to actively seek out people and create places that are a fit for them. Women are martyring themselves trying to change the existing culture, and it's miserable for everyone."

In other words, stop acting like victicrats — and take control. Shevinsky now says, "Complaining can be effective but also authoritarian, and often unpleasant for everyone involved. Building something new can be even more impactful, and I believe it's a healthier approach."

Former Sony Pictures co-chief Amy Pascal gives equally blunt advice about knowing and getting what you're worth. After the Sony cyber-attack revealed that she paid star Jennifer Lawrence less money than her less-popular male costars, Pascal offered this defense:

"Here's the problem. I run a business. People want to work for less money; I'll pay them less money. I don't call them up and say, 'Can I give you some more?' Because that's not what you do when you run a business.

"The truth is, what women have to do is not work for less money. They have to walk away. People shouldn't be so grateful for jobs. . .. People should know what they're worth."

Any questions?

Read the full story: 
www.news.investors.com

Join us - become an Elderado today at: LarryElder.com 

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Walmart Kicks Off Next Phase Of Wage Increases

By Anne D'Innocenzio, Jun. 2, 2015, KESQ

Walmart is raising starting wages for more than 100,000 U.S. department managers and workers in its deli and other specialized departments.

The moves mark the next wave of wage hikes by the nation's largest private employer, which has been under pressure from labor-backed groups for the treatment of its workers. In February, it announced it was increasing minimum wages for entry-level and long-term hourly employees to at least $10 by next February. That increase affected 500,000 of its 1.3 million U.S. workers.

The wage hikes are part of a $1 billion program at Walmart that also includes improving training and offering employees more control of their schedules. The company is hoping that by investing in its workers, its customer service will improve, and ultimately that will encourage shoppers to spend more, helping to perk up sluggish sales at its U.S. division.

In February, Walmart said it would be raising wages for its department managers but didn't offer many details.


Read the full story: www.kesq.com

Join us - become an Elderado today at: LarryElder.com 

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Los Angeles gives preliminary approval to $15 minimum wage

By Alex Dobuzinskis, May 19, 2015, Reuters

The Los Angeles City Council voted on Tuesday to increase the minimum wage in the nation's second-largest city to $15 an hour by 2020 from the current $9, in a victory for labor and community groups that have pushed for similar pay hikes in several U.S. municipalities.

The council's 14-1 vote on the measure, which must come back before the panel for final approval, would require businesses with more than 25 employees to meet the $15 pay level by 2020, while smaller businesses would have an extra year to comply.

Officials said the plan, which comes on the heels of similar minimum wage hikes in other major cities including Seattle and San Francisco, would increase pay of an estimated 800,000 workers in the city.

"We are embarking upon, I think, the most progressive minimum wage policy anywhere in the country," City Councilman Curren Price Jr., one of the main backers of the proposal, said before the vote.


Read the full story: www.reuters.com

Join us - become an Elderado today at: LarryElder.com 

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Monday, February 2, 2015

Poll: Most People Want County's Minimum Wage At $15.25

By Paige Austin, Jan. 30, 2015, Patch.com

A majority of Los Angeles County voters are in favor of raising the minimum hourly wage to $15.25 and requiring employers to offer paid sick leave, according to a poll released today.

The poll was commissioned by the Raise the Wage campaign, whose members are urging the Los Angeles City Council to approve a minimum wage hike package.

The survey, conducted by EMC Research, found that 66 percent of the 1,000 voters surveyed from Jan. 7-15 support raising the wage to $15.25 per hour, increasing the wage to match inflation, requiring earned sick days and enforcement against wage and labor violations.

The support for the wage increase and the other measures was even greater among the 600 voters who live in the city of Los Angeles, with 69 percent coming out in favor.

Support for raising the minimum wage was spread across all regions of the city, ethnic populations and age groups, according to the poll.


Read the full story:  www.patch.com

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Sunday, September 28, 2014

L.A. Mayor, City Council: Best Advertisement For The Move To Texas

By Jack Humphreville, Sept. 26, 2014, Citywatchla.com

LA WATCHDOG-On Wednesday, the Herb Wesson led City Council approved the Citywide Hotel Minimum Wage Ordinance without considering the impact on the hotel industry, the Convention Center, and the City’s well deserved “business unfriendly” reputation that has alienated employers and investors who create jobs.

As a result, on July 1, nonunion hotels with 300 or more rooms will be required to increase its hourly wage rate for all employees, including “tipped” employees, to at least $15.37, one of the highest rates in the country. On July 1, 2016, this mandated increase will apply to all nonunion hotels with 150 or more rooms. This minimum wage will also be subject to cost of living adjustments.

Unfortunately, the predisposed City Council did not engage in any real discussion or analysis of the proposed increase, ignoring the reports of three consulting firms that were only made available on Monday afternoon, hardly time for the Economic Development Committee and the City Council to digest the impact of this huge wage increase. More than likely, only a few of the Councilmembers even bothered to read the reports.

As the Editorial Board of The Los Angeles Times put it, “It’s been clear for months that the proponents of the [hotel minimum] wage on the council have no desire to have a real debate on the merits of raising pay just for hotel workers. Instead, they’ve ignored unfavorable economic studies, tuned out valid industry concerns, and overridden their own existing laws in an effort to enact what is in fact bad public policy.”


Read the full story:  www.citywatchla.com

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Thursday, September 25, 2014

L.A. City Council Backs Wage Hike For Hotel Employees

Photo:  Brian Weed, Flicker CC
By David Zahniser, Sept. 24, 2014, Latimes.com

Big hotels in Los Angeles will soon be required to pay at least $15.37 an hour to their workers — one of the highest minimum-wage requirements in the country.

The City Council voted 12 to 3 on Wednesday to impose the higher wage on large hotels, delivering a huge victory to a coalition that included organized labor, more than a dozen neighborhood councils and the ACLU of Southern California. Lawmakers cast their vote despite warnings from business advocates, who said the measure would trigger job losses at hotels stretching from Harbor Gateway to the San Fernando Valley.

Kent Wong, director of the UCLA Center for Labor Research and Education, predicted that other cities would follow L.A.'s lead, much as they did after passage of the city's landmark 1997 "living wage" ordinance mandating higher pay for employees of many city contractors.
Because of the size and prominence of the hotel industry here in Los Angeles, I do believe that this will have national reverberations.- Kent Wong, director of the UCLA Center for Labor Research and Education

"Because of the size and prominence of the hotel industry here in Los Angeles, I do believe that this will have national reverberations," he said.

Wednesday's vote serves as a warmup for what is expected to be an intense debate over a more sweeping pay proposal from Mayor Eric Garcetti, who is seeking to gradually hike L.A.'s overall minimum wage to $13.25 per hour by 2017. Maria Elena Durazo, who heads the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor and championed the hotel wage measure, said her group has no position yet on "the specifics" of Garcetti's plan.

"Our position is that we need to explicitly get to $15 an hour as soon as possible," she said.

Council members said their decision on the hotel proposal would pull families out of poverty, freeing housekeepers, banquet servers and others from having to hold a second job. "It is not OK for families … working in this thriving industry to not see their children before they go to bed," said Councilwoman Nury Martinez, who represents the central San Fernando Valley.


Read the full story:  www.latimes.com

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

By Washington Free Beacon Staff, May 9, 2014

Panera Bread CEO Rob Shaich, a Democratic donor and minimum wage supporter, recently announced that he will be replacing cashiers with computers.

Shaich, who donated $35,800 to the Obama Victory Fund, said he wanted the minimum wage raised as long as it applied equally to all, according to Tim Carney of theWashington Examiner.

My question: Will Shaich pay $10.10 an hour to the kiosks he plans to install in every Panera in America? Businessweek tells that at the coffee and sandwich shop, you’ll soon be ordering through a touch-screen kiosk. Shaich insists this won’t lead to downsizing: Panera will have fewer cashiers but more employees running the food to customers’ tables. We’ll see.

Read the full story:  
www.freebeacon.com

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
Frmr. Senator Rick Santorum
By Cameron Joseph, May 11, 2014, Thehill.com

Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) said Republicans need to support a minimum wage so as to not alienate working-class voters.

Santorum, who recently came out for increasing the national minimum wage, said he supported a smaller increase than the $10.10 an hour that President Obama has proposed. "More in the range of a dollar," he said, adding that Republicans can't be labeled as the party that always opposes raising it.

"I think it does," he told CNN's Candy Crowley when asked if he thought opposing a minimum wage hurt the party with blue-collar voters.

"You don't see too many Republicans arguing against a minimum wage. A few have, but I don't think too many do. So, if you're going to have a minimum wage, I think you just have to be reasonable about it and offer an alternative. In the past, Republicans have offered alternatives to minimum wage increases, and most of them are the ones that have been successful," he said.

Santorum said he's "looking at it" when asked about a 2016 presidential run.

Read the full story:  www.thehill.com


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Mitt Romney
By Larry Elder, May 10, 2014

RomneyCare was not enough.

Now Mitt Romney wants to throw yet another Republican position out the window. This time Romney joins the clueless leftists in Congress who seek to use government to interfere with the freedom of two parties -- the seller and the buyer of labor -- to agree on the price of labor. Romney calls for an increase in the minimum wage.

The Harvard-educated MBA knows Economics 101. As with anything, an increase in cost causes in a decrease in demand. Pricing unskilled labor beyond its productivity means fewer workers will be hired. It’s that simple.

Romney thinks government-set minimum wage is smart politics. He’s wrong.

True, polls show that even Republicans support a minimum wage hike. But the Congressional Budget Office recently released a report saying that an increase in minimum wage from the current $7.25 an hour to President Obama’s proposed $10.10 by the second half of 2016 would likely result in 500,000 fewer jobs.

How wrongheaded are minimum wage laws? Economist and Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman called minimum wage laws “one of the most, if not the most, anti-black laws on the statute books.”

The libertarian CATO Institute says the 1933 National Industrial Recovery Act allowed FDR to “issue executive orders establishing some 700 industrial cartels, which restricted output and forced wages and prices above market levels. The minimum wage regulations made it illegal for employers to hire people who weren’t worth the minimum because they lacked skills. As a result, some 500,000 blacks, particularly in the South, were estimated to have lost their jobs.”

How wrongheaded are minimum wage laws? The following, believe or not, is a 1987 editorial from The New York Times! They have, of course, reversed their position from opposing to supporting minimum wage. But at one time, even The New York Times had it right:

New York Times Editorial

January 14, 1987

The Right Minimum Wage: $0.00

The Federal minimum wage has been frozen at $3.35 an hour for six years. In some states, it now compares unfavorably even with welfare benefits available without working. It's no wonder then that Edward Kennedy, the new chairman of the Senate Labor Committee, is being pressed by organized labor to battle for an increase.
No wonder, but still a mistake. Anyone working in America surely deserves a better living standard than can be managed on $3.35 an hour. But there's a virtual consensus among economists that the minimum wage is an idea whose time has passed. Raising the minimum wage by a substantial amount would price working poor people out of the job market. A far better way to help them would be to subsidize their wages or - better yet - help them acquire the skills needed to earn more on their own. 

An increase in the minimum wage to, say, $4.35 would restore the purchasing power of bottom-tier wages. It would also permit a minimum-wage breadwinner to earn almost enough to keep a family of three above the official poverty line. There are catches, however. It would increase employers' incentives to evade the law, expanding the underground economy. More important, it would increase unemployment: Raise the legal minimum price of labor above the productivity of the least skilled workers and fewer will be hired.

If a higher minimum means fewer jobs, why does it remain on the agenda of some liberals? A higher minimum would undoubtedly raise the living standard of the majority of low-wage workers who could keep their jobs. That gain, it is argued, would justify the sacrifice of the minority who became unemployable. The argument isn't convincing. Those at greatest risk from a higher minimum would be young, poor workers, who already face formidable barriers to getting and keeping jobs. Indeed, President Reagan has proposed a lower minimum wage just to improve their chances of finding work.

Perhaps the mistake here is to accept the limited terms of the debate. The working poor obviously deserve a better shake. But it should not surpass our ingenuity or generosity to help some of them without hurting others. Here are two means toward that end: Wage supplements. Government might subsidize low wages with cash or payments for medical insurance, pensions or Social Security taxes. Alternatively, Washington could enlarge the existing earned income tax credit, a ''negative'' income tax paying up to $800 a year to working poor families. This would permit better targeting, since minimum-wage workers in affluent families would not be eligible. Training and education. The alternative to supplementing income for the least skilled workers is to raise their earning power in a free labor market. In the last two decades, dozens of programs to do that have produced mixed results at a very high cost. But the concept isn't necessarily at fault; nurturing the potential of individuals raised in poverty is very difficult. A humane society would learn from its mistakes and keep trying.

The idea of using a minimum wage to overcome poverty is old, honorable -- and fundamentally flawed. It's time to put this hoary debate behind us, and find a better way to improve the lives of people who work very hard for very little.


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Sunday, May 4, 2014

By Brendan Bordelon, May 2, 2014, Newsbusters.org

California Democratic congresswoman Barbara Lee expressed support for a $26 minimum wage in her state — a move Republican congressman Andy Harris encouraged, assuming jobs would rapidly flee California to his state of Maryland.

Lee and Harris appeared Friday on CNN’s “Crossfire,” hosted by former Obama advisor Van Jones and former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. The panel discussed the proposed increase in the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 per hour.

“Let me ask you this question, you’re a good advocate for this,” Gingrich asked Lee. “The mayor of Seattle is proposing that the minimum wage ought to go up to $15 an hour.”

“Good for him,” Lee responded. “In California — more than likely, from what I remembered — a living wage where people could live and take care of their families and move toward achieving the American dream was about $25, $26 an hour.”

“So would you support that as a minimum wage for California?” Gingrich asked.

“Absolutely I would support it for California. I think the regional factors –”

“And you don’t think that’d have an effect on unemployment?” Gingrich interrupted.

“No, Newt, trust me, believe you me,” Lee replied, “you’d have a more productive workforce, you’d have people who could afford to live in areas now where they cannot afford to live. You would increase diversity in certain communities where you don’t have diversity anymore. You would have economic parity and the income gap would begin to close.”

Read the full story:  www.dailycaller.com


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Sunday, April 6, 2014




Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Friday, March 21, 2014


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"LIke" Larry Elder on Facebook