Showing posts with label Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. Show all posts

Monday, August 18, 2014

The Coming Race War Won’t Be About Race

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
Source:  Wikimedia, Commons
By Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Aug. 17, 2014, Time.com

Ferguson is not just about systemic racism — it's about class warfare and how America's poor are held back, says Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.

Will the recent rioting in Ferguson, Missouri, be a tipping point in the struggle against racial injustice, or will it be a minor footnote in some future grad student’s thesis on Civil Unrest in the Early Twenty-First Century?

The answer can be found in May of 1970.

You probably have heard of the Kent State shootings: on May 4, 1970, the Ohio National Guard opened fire on student protesters at Kent State University. During those 13 seconds of gunfire, four students were killed and nine were wounded, one of whom was permanently paralyzed. The shock and outcry resulted in a nationwide strike of 4 million students that closed more than 450 campuses. Five days after the shooting, 100,000 protestors gathered in Washington, D.C. And the nation’s youth was energetically mobilized to end the Vietnam War, racism, sexism, and mindless faith in the political establishment.

You probably haven’t heard of the Jackson State shootings.

On May 14th, 10 days after Kent State ignited the nation, at the predominantly black Jackson State University in Mississippi, police killed two black students (one a high school senior, the other the father of an 18-month-old baby) with shotguns and wounded twelve others.

There was no national outcry. The nation was not mobilized to do anything. That heartless leviathan we call History swallowed that event whole, erasing it from the national memory.

And, unless we want the Ferguson atrocity to also be swallowed and become nothing more than an intestinal irritant to history, we have to address the situation not just as another act of systemic racism, but as what else it is: class warfare.

By focusing on just the racial aspect, the discussion becomes about whether Michael Brown’s death—or that of the other three unarmed black men who were killed by police in the U.S. within that month—is about discrimination or about police justification. Then we’ll argue about whether there isn’t just as much black-against-white racism in the U.S. as there is white-against-black. (Yes, there is. But, in general, white-against-black economically impacts the future of the black community. Black-against-white has almost no measurable social impact.)


Read the full story:  www.time.com

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Saturday, May 3, 2014



Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver
By Larry Elder, May 3, 2014

History or just the tape? This is not a trick question. It is a multiple choice with only two possible answers.

Based on what NBA commissioner Adam Silver said during the press conference, why did he impose a $2.5 million fine and recommend a ban of Sterling and a forced sale of the Clippers from their embattled owner Donald Sterling?

Did Silver impose this punishment:

A) because of this tape and this tape only?

Or

B) because of Sterling’s track record, including the offensive tape; two settlements with the housing authorities over accusations of refusing to rent to blacks; lawsuit filed by former general manager Elgin Baylor alleging wage and age discrimination; Sterling’s demeaning treatment of employees and others both within and without the Clippers and the NBA; and finally the cold, tightfisted way Sterling's run the Clippers for most of his 33 years of ownership?

Pick one. Which was it? On what did Silver say he based his decision -- the tape or Sterling’s conduct during his 30+ years as owner?

Most people would probably say B), that Silver urges a ban for an ownership tenure full of offensive actions with the tape serving as the last straw, the final offense in a series of them.

Sterling certainly piled up quite a track record. In a piece for Time Magazine -- written before Silver imposed the ban -- former Laker great Kareem Abdul-Jabbar summarizes the most cited and troubling issues:

“2006: U.S. Dept. of Justice sued Sterling for housing discrimination. Allegedly, he said, ‘Black tenants smell and attract vermin.’

“2009: [Sterling] reportedly paid $2.73 million in a Justice Dept. suit alleging he discriminated against blacks, Hispanics, and families with children in his rentals. (He also had to pay an additional nearly $5 million in attorneys fees and costs due to his counsel’s ‘sometimes outrageous conduct.’)

“2009: Clippers executive (and one of the greatest NBA players in history) sued for employment discrimination based on age and race.”

For the record, Baylor lost his lawsuit -- a detail often omitted in the litany of Sterling's supposed racism-revealing offenses.

This gets us back to the tape. What did he say that was so offensive? Smart people see different things in the same tape. But nearly all have reached the same conclusion. The tape is slam-dunk, smoking gun, exhibit A of Sterling’s “racism” -- confirmed by a long track record.

But a lot of smart people are dead wrong. Again, what did Sterling say? Of course, he said many things, including a strange dissertation on the treatment of “black Jews” in Israel.

For example, I asked TMZ's Harvey Levin the following question: Can you name the most egregious thing that Don Sterling said in that tape? Levin said it was his “disdain.”

I repeated my question, what were his "words" -- not your interpretation of them. The most offensive “words”? Harvey eventually said, Sterling said he didn't want her bringing Magic Johnson a game.

That’s it? Johnson, mind you, was given permission from Sterling -- as he says on the tape -- to sleep with his girlfriend. And Johnson can attend a game without Sterling’s girlfriend. And Sterling never came close to saying he did not want blacks at games.  He just doesn’t want the embarrassment of his friends telling him about it the next day. This may call for a shrink -- or for remedial courses at Racism School -- but taking away his team?

Meanwhile, media have collectively agreed not to ask about the nature of Johnson’s friendship with Sterling’s girlfriend.  That’s too personal.  But a secretly recorded tape of someone in private quarters by an enemy/mistress -- no worries.

I also put the question to L.A. City Councilman Bernard Parks, a former LAPD chief. Provide us, I said, with the most offensive words that Sterling uttered.

As with TMZ’s Levin,  he summarized what he thought were Sterling’s views on the tape. As with Harvey, I demanded specifics. He finally described the haughty way in which Sterling said, “I buy them” cars, clothing, houses etc.

A boss who expresses a condescending attitude towards his employees is racist? Does it matter that two of his 14 players are white. Does he not also buy their things, too?

For reasons unfair to Sterling, these exculpatory passages from the recording are rarely mentioned:

V. Stiviano: What's wrong with minorities? What's wrong with black people?

Sterling: Nothing, nothing.

Stiviano: What's wrong with Hispanics?

Sterling: It's like talking to an enemy. There's nothing wrong with minorities, they're fabulous. Fabulous. Because you’re an enemy to me. …

Stiviano: You can’t even be seen with someone in which is considered a different skin color.

Sterling: They can be with me all day long and all night long. … I’m not a good person in your eyes. If I was a good person, you wouldn’t say ‘I can’t believe’ this, ‘I can’t believe’ that -- which are all lies. I love the black people.

Before we look at Silver's press conference transcript, we ask again.  

Did Silver ban Sterling solely because of the offensive tape?

Or did Silver take action based on Sterling’s “body of work” -- acts of offensive, demeaning and "racist" behavior over a long tenure?

Here are the parts of Silver press conference, in which he addresses how Silver reached his decision to ban Sterling:

Silver: The views expressed by Mr. Sterling are deeply offensive and harmful; that they came from an NBA owner only heightens the damage and my personal outrage.

 Silver: We stand together in condemning Mr. Sterling’s views. They simply have no place in the NBA.

 Q: The word you used specifically was outrage. You said that you were personally outraged, yet many people believe that they are outraged that for years people have known that this man is a racist slumlord and the NBA hasn’t done anything until today. Can you please answer why?

Silver: I can’t speak to past actions other than to say that when specific evidence was brought to the NBA, we acted.

Q: Should someone lose their team for remarks shared in private, as this is a slippery slope?

Silver: Whether or not these remarks were initially shared in private, they are now public, and they represent his views

Q: [In] determining what the punishment would be, including the suggestion to the Board of Governors, did you take into account Mr. Sterling’s past behavior, or was it just based on this one particular incident?

Silver: In meting out this punishment, we did not take into account his past behavior [emphasis added]. When the board ultimately considers his overall fitness to be an owner in the NBA, they will take into account a lifetime of behavior.

Q: Just to be clear, you said when specific evidence was brought to the league you did act. In past cases, has Donald Sterling ever been fined or suspended for racial or offensive remarks, and if not, why not?

Silver: He’s never been suspended or fined by the league because while there have been well-documented rumors and cases filed, he was sued and the plaintiff lost the lawsuit. That was Elgin Baylor. There was a case brought by the Department of Justice in which ultimately Donald Sterling settled and there was no finding of guilt, and those are the only cases that have been brought to our attention. When those two litigations were brought, they were followed closely by the league office.

Q: Just a follow to that, one of the greatest players of all time, Elgin Baylor, accused Donald Sterling of running a plantation style franchise. Did that not concern you, and why was that not investigated? Despite the fact he lost the case, he has a prominent standing in the league and he said some very serious things.

Silver: It concerned us greatly. We followed the litigation closely, and ultimately Elgin Baylor did not prevail n that litigation [emphasis added].

As you can see, Silver emphatically insists he reached his harsh decision based solely on what he heard on the tape. None of Sterling’s prior behavior was a factor. Indeed, Silver defends the NBA’s prior lack of action against Sterling by saying no one brought actionable leads. So Sterling’s record, as far as the league is concerned, is clean.

The owners can, as Silver says, use prior behavior in making their vote to kick Sterling out. But Silver’s decision to fine and recommend a ban is just based only on what Sterling said in the tape.

Again, listen to Sterling’s words.

Sterling never says the "n" word, speaks about his respect for Magic Johnson and even shrieks "I love the black people." Stripping the conversation to its bones, we are left with this. An old billionaire is jealous of Magic Johnson -- and doesn’t want his girlfriend sitting next to him at games. She can sleep with Magic, he tells her, in fact, she can sleep with anybody she wants, just don't embarrass him:

“How about the -- how about your whole life, every day, you could do whatever you want? You could sleep with them. You could bring them in. You could do whatever you want. The little I ask you is not to promote it on that, and not to bring them to my games.”

And for these Jerry Springer outtakes Donald Sterling loses his team?


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Friday, May 2, 2014

Leon Jenkins
By Larry Elder, May 2, 2014

The SterlingGate circus continues.

UCLA refuses Donald Sterling’s gift of $3 million, and returns nearly $500,000 already given. Why haven’t all the recipients, horrified at Sterling’s “racism,” also returned his money?

NBA great Kareem Abdul-Jabbar briefly worked for Sterling. Is he giving back the money? Will the Los Angeles Clippers players, all of whom participated in the pre-game protest against Sterling, be returning the money he’s paid them?

The NAACP-LA head, Leon Jenkins, has resigned. In his letter of resignation, Jenkins said:

“Please be advised that the legacy, history and reputation of the NAACP is more important to me than the presidency. In order to separate the Los Angeles NAACP and the NAACP from the negative exposure I have caused the NAACP, I respectfully resign my position as President of the Los Angeles NAACP.”

“Negative exposure”?

USA Today said, “Jenkins has come under fire from the public in recent days after it was made public that the chapter honored Sterling with a lifetime achievement award in 2009 and planned to do so again this month.”

The Washington Post wrote of Jenkins sudden resignation and also attributed it to the controversy from the chapter’s awards given to Sterling: “The head of the NAACP in Los Angeles has resigned following criticism of the chapter’s warm relationship with Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling despite his history of racial remarks.”

But is that the only reason Jenkins resigned?

Jenkins has been thrust into national medial attention because of the Sterling controversy. But as a result, some in the media have taken a look into Jenkins’ background -- and it isn’t pretty.

Turns out he is a disbarred ex-Detroit judge, kicked off the bench by the Michigan Supreme Court. The Los Angeles Times wrote:

“While Jenkins was a Detroit judge, he was indicted in 1988 on federal bribery, conspiracy, mail fraud and racketeering charges, according to records from the State Bar of California.

“Authorities at the time alleged that Jenkins received gifts from those who appeared in his court and committed perjury, according to the records.

“He was acquitted of criminal charges, but in 1994 the Michigan Supreme Court disbarred him, finding ‘overwhelming evidence’ that Jenkins ‘sold his office and his public trust,’ according to the bar records.


“Jenkins was practicing law in California in 1991, serving as an attorney to the family of Latasha Harlins, an African American girl who was fatally shot by a Korean grocery store owner in South L.A., according to Times reports at the time.

“In 1995, the state bar began looking into the misconduct allegations from Michigan. He was disbarred in 2001. He tried to be reinstated in 2006 but was rejected, according to records. He made another attempt in 2012.

“Earlier this month, the bar turned him down, questioning whether he had the ‘moral fitness to resume the practice of law,’ according to records. The bar stated that he had made misrepresentations on divorce papers and on his petition for reinstatement to the bar. Officials said he failed to disclose a $660,000 loan he owed former legal clients.”

And this guy supposedly raised $2 million for the local branch? With his track record, has the branch conducted an investigation to make sure the money is accounted for? Better count the money!

This is likely what Jenkins meant in his resignation letter when he talked of “negative exposure.”

The NAACP national headquarters says it is embarrassed that Sterling, given his track record, was about to yet another “lifetime” award from the L.A. branch. The home office says its developing guidelines for awards so that branches can follow standards for eligibility.

But the greater embarrassment is that until this controversy, a disbarred judge, thrown off by the Michigan Supreme Court for taking bribes, ran the NAACP-LA branch.



Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Monday, April 28, 2014

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
By Brendan Bordelon, Apr. 28, 2014, Dailycaller.com

NBA legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar attacked the collective outrage emanating from America’s media over Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling’s alleged racist remarks, calling the publication of a private conversation “sleazy” and wondering why earlier, more public manifestations of racism failed to similarly shock.

In an op-ed published in Time, Abdul-Jabbar explains that we’re witnessing a veritable “finger-wagging Olympics . . . all over the latest in a long line of rich white celebrities to come out of the racist closet.”

“Yes, I’m angry, too,” Abdul-Jabbar admits, “but not just about the sins of Donald Sterling. I’ve got a list.”

That list includes Sterling’s girlfriend, V. Stiviano, whose voice is heard on the racially-loaded tape and who likely set the Clippers’ owner up.

“Man, what a winding road she led him down to get all of that out,” he mocked. “She was like a sexy nanny playing ‘pin the fried chicken on the Sambo.’ She blindfolded him and spun him around until he was just blathering all sorts of incoherent racist sound bites that had the news media peeing themselves with glee.”

And speaking of the news media? “They caught big game on a slow news day,” Abdul-Jabbar explained, “so they put his head on a pike, dubbed him Lord of the Flies, and danced around him whooping.”

Read the full story:  www.dailycaller.com


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook