![]() |
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver |
By Larry Elder, May 3, 2014
History or just the tape? This
is not a trick question. It is a multiple choice with only two possible
answers.
Based on what NBA
commissioner Adam Silver said during
the press conference, why did he impose a $2.5 million fine and recommend a ban
of Sterling and a forced sale of the Clippers from their embattled owner Donald
Sterling?
Did Silver impose this
punishment:
A) because of this tape and
this tape only?
Or
B) because of Sterling’s
track record, including the offensive tape; two settlements with the housing
authorities over accusations of refusing to rent to blacks; lawsuit filed by former
general manager Elgin Baylor alleging wage and age discrimination; Sterling’s
demeaning treatment of employees and others both within and without the
Clippers and the NBA; and finally the cold, tightfisted way Sterling's run the
Clippers for most of his 33 years of ownership?
Pick one. Which was it? On
what did Silver say he based his
decision -- the tape or Sterling’s conduct during his 30+ years as owner?
Most people would probably say
B), that Silver urges a ban for an ownership tenure full of offensive actions
with the tape serving as the last straw, the final offense in a series of them.
Sterling certainly piled up
quite a track record. In a piece for Time Magazine -- written before Silver
imposed the ban -- former Laker great Kareem Abdul-Jabbar summarizes the most cited
and troubling issues:
“2006: U.S. Dept. of Justice sued Sterling for housing discrimination. Allegedly, he said, ‘Black tenants smell and attract vermin.’
“2009: [Sterling] reportedly paid $2.73 million in a Justice Dept. suit alleging he discriminated against blacks, Hispanics, and families with children in his rentals. (He also had to pay an additional nearly $5 million in attorneys fees and costs due to his counsel’s ‘sometimes outrageous conduct.’)
“2009: Clippers executive (and one of the greatest NBA players in history) sued for employment discrimination based on age and race.”
For the record, Baylor lost
his lawsuit -- a detail often omitted in the litany of Sterling's supposed
racism-revealing offenses.
This gets us back to the
tape. What did he say that was so
offensive? Smart people see different things in the same tape. But nearly all
have reached the same conclusion. The tape is slam-dunk, smoking gun, exhibit A
of Sterling’s “racism” -- confirmed by a long track record.
But a lot of smart people
are dead wrong. Again, what did Sterling say?
Of course, he said many things, including a strange dissertation on the treatment
of “black Jews” in Israel.
For example, I asked TMZ's
Harvey Levin the following question: Can you name the most egregious thing that
Don Sterling said in that tape? Levin said it was his “disdain.”
I repeated my question, what
were his "words" -- not
your interpretation of them. The most offensive “words”? Harvey eventually said, Sterling said he didn't want her
bringing Magic Johnson a game.
That’s it? Johnson, mind
you, was given permission from Sterling -- as he says on the tape -- to sleep
with his girlfriend. And Johnson can attend a game without Sterling’s
girlfriend. And Sterling never came close to saying he did not want blacks at
games. He just doesn’t want the
embarrassment of his friends telling him about it the next day. This may call
for a shrink -- or for remedial courses at Racism School -- but taking away his
team?
Meanwhile, media have collectively
agreed not to ask about the nature of Johnson’s friendship with Sterling’s
girlfriend. That’s too personal. But a
secretly recorded tape of someone in private quarters by an enemy/mistress -- no
worries.
I also put the question to
L.A. City Councilman Bernard Parks, a former LAPD chief. Provide us, I said,
with the most offensive words that Sterling uttered.
As with TMZ’s Levin, he summarized
what he thought were Sterling’s views
on the tape. As with Harvey, I demanded specifics. He finally described the
haughty way in which Sterling said, “I buy them” cars, clothing, houses etc.
A boss who expresses a
condescending attitude towards his employees is racist? Does it matter that two
of his 14 players are white. Does he not also buy their things, too?
For reasons unfair to
Sterling, these exculpatory passages from the recording are rarely mentioned:
V. Stiviano: What's wrong
with minorities? What's wrong with black people?
Sterling: Nothing, nothing.
Stiviano: What's wrong with
Hispanics?
Sterling: It's like talking
to an enemy. There's nothing wrong with minorities, they're fabulous. Fabulous.
Because you’re an enemy to me. …
Stiviano: You can’t even be
seen with someone in which is considered a different skin color.
Sterling: They can be with
me all day long and all night long. … I’m not a good person in your eyes. If I
was a good person, you wouldn’t say ‘I can’t believe’ this, ‘I can’t believe’
that -- which are all lies. I love the black people.
Before we look at Silver's
press conference transcript, we ask again.
Did Silver ban Sterling solely because of the offensive tape?
Or did Silver take action
based on Sterling’s “body of work” -- acts of offensive, demeaning and
"racist" behavior over a long tenure?
Here are the parts of Silver
press conference, in which he addresses how Silver reached his decision to ban
Sterling:
Silver: The views expressed by Mr. Sterling are deeply offensive and harmful; that they came from an NBA owner only heightens the damage and my personal outrage.
Silver: We stand together in condemning Mr. Sterling’s views. They simply have no place in the NBA.
Q: The word you used specifically was outrage. You said that you were personally outraged, yet many people believe that they are outraged that for years people have known that this man is a racist slumlord and the NBA hasn’t done anything until today. Can you please answer why?
Silver: I can’t speak to past actions other than to say that when specific evidence was brought to the NBA, we acted.
Q: Should someone lose their team for remarks shared in private, as this is a slippery slope?
Silver: Whether or not these remarks were initially shared in private, they are now public, and they represent his views
Q: [In] determining what the punishment would be, including the suggestion to the Board of Governors, did you take into account Mr. Sterling’s past behavior, or was it just based on this one particular incident?
Silver: In meting out this punishment, we did not take into account his past behavior [emphasis added]. When the board ultimately considers his overall fitness to be an owner in the NBA, they will take into account a lifetime of behavior.
Q: Just to be clear, you said when specific evidence was brought to the league you did act. In past cases, has Donald Sterling ever been fined or suspended for racial or offensive remarks, and if not, why not?
Silver: He’s never been suspended or fined by the league because while there have been well-documented rumors and cases filed, he was sued and the plaintiff lost the lawsuit. That was Elgin Baylor. There was a case brought by the Department of Justice in which ultimately Donald Sterling settled and there was no finding of guilt, and those are the only cases that have been brought to our attention. When those two litigations were brought, they were followed closely by the league office.
Q: Just a follow to that, one of the greatest players of all time, Elgin Baylor, accused Donald Sterling of running a plantation style franchise. Did that not concern you, and why was that not investigated? Despite the fact he lost the case, he has a prominent standing in the league and he said some very serious things.
Silver: It concerned us greatly. We followed the litigation closely, and ultimately Elgin Baylor did not prevail n that litigation [emphasis added].
As you can see, Silver
emphatically insists he reached his harsh decision based solely on what he heard on the tape. None of Sterling’s prior behavior
was a factor. Indeed, Silver defends the NBA’s prior lack of action against
Sterling by saying no one brought actionable leads. So Sterling’s record, as
far as the league is concerned, is clean.
The owners can, as Silver says,
use prior behavior in making their vote to kick Sterling out. But Silver’s
decision to fine and recommend a ban is just
based only on what Sterling said in the tape.
Again, listen to Sterling’s
words.
Sterling never says the
"n" word, speaks about his respect for Magic Johnson and even shrieks
"I love the black people." Stripping the conversation to its bones, we
are left with this. An old billionaire is jealous of Magic Johnson -- and
doesn’t want his girlfriend sitting next to him at games. She can sleep with Magic,
he tells her, in fact, she can sleep with anybody she wants, just don't
embarrass him:
“How about the -- how about
your whole life, every day, you could do whatever you want? You could sleep
with them. You could bring them in. You could do whatever you want. The little
I ask you is not to promote it on that, and not to bring them to my games.”
And for these Jerry Springer
outtakes Donald Sterling loses his team?
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement