Judicial Watch: Obama Admin. Spending Half a Billion Annually on Executive Amnesty
Mar. 7, 2015
"...while a court has halted amnesty, they’ve learned the true cost. joining us now with the details, tom fitten from washington. thank for coming on this morning. this plan rngs which again is on hold right now, but likely to take effect at some point, has been billed as basically a bill for civil rights. there’s been no attention to its monetary costs. what are they? >> obama’s discretion is going to cost upwards of a half a billion dollars a year. nearly $484 billion a year. by the admission of the obama administration. and a they want to hire 3100 people. they’re paying in one build, $660,000 a month in rent and in the first year, they’ve handled 1.4 million applications. this is a massive amnesty program anthis money again, no authorization and law. >> so, these are direct costs. not taking into account the effect of wages that will be depressed by more low wage immigrants or the competition american born workers will have for jobs. these are just direct government costs. >> and a that’s right. dhs doesn’t have incident spending, even though it is a federal agency, so the money has to come from somewhere and our experience with the last dream act amnesty, which was also illegal, basically, the handling of legal applications for green cards shut down, so if you were a u.s. citizen trying to get your foreign born wife into the country, you had to wait a year, but if you were an illegal alien, you’re stamped right through. >> so, the united states is paying just again, direct costs, many other costs associated, but half a billion dollars to break u.s. law. why? what’s the purpose of this? >> well, the purpose is to enact president’s, the president’s discretion and essentially allow you if you’re here for a certain period of time, to apply for provisional status or legal status and be able to work and the administration’s encouraging you, even if you don’t think you’ll pass and get the application approved, come in and apply any way and you’ll get the benefit of not being deported. essential essentially, would allow virtually anyone who’s here illegally to continue to stay here and as i said, upwards of $484 billion a year, a million dollars a year, but that’s just for the first year. think of it every year from here on in. and of course, it’s going to draw more illegal aliens in, so the cost will just increase over time. >> all democratic voters. the same administration that’s advertiseing for food stamps in mexico. …"
Mar. 7, 2015
"...while a court has halted amnesty, they’ve learned the true cost. joining us now with the details, tom fitten from washington. thank for coming on this morning. this plan rngs which again is on hold right now, but likely to take effect at some point, has been billed as basically a bill for civil rights. there’s been no attention to its monetary costs. what are they? >> obama’s discretion is going to cost upwards of a half a billion dollars a year. nearly $484 billion a year. by the admission of the obama administration. and a they want to hire 3100 people. they’re paying in one build, $660,000 a month in rent and in the first year, they’ve handled 1.4 million applications. this is a massive amnesty program anthis money again, no authorization and law. >> so, these are direct costs. not taking into account the effect of wages that will be depressed by more low wage immigrants or the competition american born workers will have for jobs. these are just direct government costs. >> and a that’s right. dhs doesn’t have incident spending, even though it is a federal agency, so the money has to come from somewhere and our experience with the last dream act amnesty, which was also illegal, basically, the handling of legal applications for green cards shut down, so if you were a u.s. citizen trying to get your foreign born wife into the country, you had to wait a year, but if you were an illegal alien, you’re stamped right through. >> so, the united states is paying just again, direct costs, many other costs associated, but half a billion dollars to break u.s. law. why? what’s the purpose of this? >> well, the purpose is to enact president’s, the president’s discretion and essentially allow you if you’re here for a certain period of time, to apply for provisional status or legal status and be able to work and the administration’s encouraging you, even if you don’t think you’ll pass and get the application approved, come in and apply any way and you’ll get the benefit of not being deported. essential essentially, would allow virtually anyone who’s here illegally to continue to stay here and as i said, upwards of $484 billion a year, a million dollars a year, but that’s just for the first year. think of it every year from here on in. and of course, it’s going to draw more illegal aliens in, so the cost will just increase over time. >> all democratic voters. the same administration that’s advertiseing for food stamps in mexico. …"
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement