Showing posts with label National Organization for Women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Organization for Women. Show all posts

Thursday, September 18, 2014

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell
Source:  www.sonofwashington.com
By Larry Elder, Sept. 18, 2014

When NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell handed down a mere a two-game suspension for domestic violence, he took his cue from some of the very same women's groups now calling for his head.

Goodell first suspended Ray Rice, a star player, for two games four months after Rice's grand jury indictment for third-degree aggravated assault. A hotel video showing Rice dragging his then-fiancee's limp body out of an elevator "went viral." Rice reportedly admitted to Goodell that he punched her in the face, knocking her down. For this, Goodell suspended Rice just two games.

The protests over the light punishment turned to screams when another video became public, this one showing Rice inside the elevator delivering the punch. Why did it take that video to understand the gravity of the offense? After all, even without the video, one knew that Rice's now-wife didn't slip on a bar of soap.

Among those crying foul is the National Organization for Women. NOW President Terry O'Neill said: "The NFL has lost its way. It doesn't have a Ray Rice problem; it has a violence against women problem. ... The only workable solution is for Roger Goodell to resign and for his successor to appoint an independent investigator with full authority to gather factual data about domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking within the NFL community and to recommend real and lasting reforms."

What about NOW's indifference toward, if not acceptance of, the late Sen. Ted Kennedy's sordid record of disgusting behavior toward women?

In 1990, Gentlemen's Quarterly published an expose of Kennedy that would have brought down the career of virtually any politician, including a legacy lefty fawned over by the media. According to the piece, Kennedy was not merely a drunken skirt chaser; he was a criminal serial sexual predator:

"As (waitress Carla) Gaviglio enters the room, the six-foot-two, 225-plus-pound Kennedy grabs the five-foot-three, 103-pound waitress and throws her on the table. She lands on her back, scattering crystal, plates and cutlery and the lit candles. Several glasses and a crystal candlestick are broken. Kennedy then picks her up from the table and throws her on (Sen. Chris) Dodd, who is sprawled in a chair. With Gaviglio on Dodd's lap, Kennedy jumps on top and begins rubbing his genital area against hers, supporting his weight on the arms of the chair. As he is doing this, another waitress enters the room. She and Gaviglio both scream, drawing one or two dishwashers. Startled, Kennedy leaps up. He laughs. Bruised, shaken and angry over what she considered a sexual assault, Gaviglio runs from the room."

Perhaps the NFL took its cue from NOW's embrace of Bill Clinton, about whom liberal British journalist Christopher Hitchens said was credibly accused of rape three times. Hitchens, author of the book "No One Left to Lie To," appeared in 1999 on the ABC show "Politically Incorrect": "Mr. Clinton is a rapist. ... Believably accused three times of rape. ... I operate on the presumption of guilt. ... I can't convict anybody, but I'm not going to say Juanita Broaddrick is a liar, because everything she says checks out, and President Clinton hasn't denied it yet. He won't comment on the accusations. It's not his word against hers -- and if it was, it would be the word of a psychopathic liar."

Perhaps Goodell took his cue from the non-reaction to Juanita Broaddrick's appearance on Dateline NBC where she accused Bill Clinton of rape: "Stupid me, I ordered coffee to the room," she said. "I thought we were going to talk about the campaign." On NBC's "Dateline," a tearful Broaddrick said: "I first pushed him away. I just told him 'no.' ... He tries to kiss me again. He starts biting on my lip. ... And then he forced me down on the bed. I just was very frightened. I tried to get away from him. I told him 'no.' ... He wouldn't listen to me."

Or perhaps Goodell took his cue from the non-reaction to Kathleen Willey. Willey, a former White House volunteer and self-described "good friend" of the then-president, appeared on "60 Minutes" and accused Clinton of sexual battery.

"I just told him that my husband was in financial difficulty and that things were at a crisis point," said Willey, "and that my volunteer days were over, that I needed a regular paying job and could he help me." But in a small room just off the Oval Office, she says, Clinton hugged and kissed her. When she tried to push him away, "he touched my breasts with his hand ... and then he whispered ... 'I've wanted to do this ever since I laid eyes on you.' ... He took my hand, and he put it ... on his genitals."

Ted Kennedy was lionized. Bill Clinton is adored. Accusers Broaddrick, Willey, Paula Jones and Gennifer Flowers have been ignored, dismissed or branded as liars. Where was NOW then?


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Monday, September 15, 2014

What DOES the NFL Stand For--Does Goodell Need to Go?

By Sarah Taylor, Sept. 15, 2014, Fishwrapper.com

The big questions are being asked this week: what does the NFL mean for women, and how will the seemingly rampant domestic violence against both ladies and children be eradicated if those perpetrating the violence aren't being properly punished for their insidious infractions?

Two women's coalitions, Ultra Violent and the National Organization, have taken matters into their own hands and have begun flying banners two hours prior to game time saying, "Roger Goodell Must Go."

In the latest development, Adrian Peterson has been reinstated to play against the Saints in the upcoming game week ... which is yet another despicable move by his team, and ultimately the NFL, in light of the fact that he beat his 4-year-old child with a switch to the point of bleeding.

Read the full story:  www.fishwrapper.com

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Saturday, September 13, 2014

FLASHBACK: Hypocrisy Of N.O.W.--Why Tammy Bruce Resigned

By Shawn Hubler, May 7, 2014, Latimes.com

Tammy Bruce, the outspoken and provocative president of the National Organization for Women's Los Angeles chapter, announced her resignation Monday, five months after she was publicly called on the carpet by NOW's national president for her comments on race in the wake of the O.J. Simpson case.

Bruce, who garnered national attention with her condemnation of Simpson's acquittal, said she is quitting to launch a new national nonprofit organization dedicated to women's and children's rights.

Working with her at the helm of the nascent Women's Progress Alliance, she said, will be Denise Brown--sister of Simpson's slain ex-wife, Nicole. The Mid-Wilshire-based organization, which also will have offices in New York and Washington, will focus on domestic violence, women's health issues, family equity and the image of women in the media, Bruce said.

"We both have been controversial," Bruce acknowledged, "and we both will remain controversial. . . . We also are both people who will not be defined by men who would like to discredit women who call attention to the truth."


Read the full story:  www.articles.latimes.com

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

Sunday, April 13, 2014

Jack Coleman, Apr. 13, 2014, Newsbusters.org

When it comes to a manufactured issue such as unequal pay between men and women, a disparity that exists only in the aggregate and evaporates among individuals, you can expect to hear a fair number of suspect claims.

But an assertion made by National Organization for Women president Terry O'Neill while a guest on Ed Schultz's radio show last week, talking about the proposed Paycheck Fairness Act, went beyond suspicious toward something more closely resembling the inane. (Audio) --

SCHULTZ: Lamar Alexander, senator from Tennessee, the conservative position is, is that he thinks that this is going to result in more lawsuits, he thinks that this, basically, the free market is going to take care of all of this, that it would end up getting government involvement into the business world. What's your response to that? Especially the fact the lawsuit end of it, what about that? I mean, it would seem to me that it would reduce lawsuits.


O'NEILL: Well, I think over time it should reduce lawsuits but let's be clear, we do not have a free market today and the labor market is not free and a major reason why it's not free is the employers have an unfair advantage. They have transparency. They know everything they need to know about their employees, all they have to do is go on Facebook. They've got, I mean, you've got, you've got serious non-transparency issues (chuckles as lunacy of what she just said sinks in) that are only going to get worse in the age of technological information, right? But what do employees really know about their employers? Very little. It is a black box. We don't know, employees generally don't know the reasoning that goes behind the wage rates that are set by the employer. And if you don't have equal knowledge on two sides of a transaction, you don't have a free market. So anybody talking about a free market, they need to be honest and say a free market actually is one in which the employees have as much knowledge as the employer, right? So, so what you need to create a free market are policies, rules, the employer has to be transparent, just like the employee is transparent. Once you get those rules in place, and enforced, then you start seeing the free market operate correctly. And frankly, I think in the short run there will be more lawsuits and there should be.

Read the full story:  www.newsbusters.org



Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook