Sunday, May 25, 2014

Isla Vista Murdering Spree: More Gun Laws? By Larry Elder

Map via New York Daily News
By Larry Elder, May 25, 2014

In light of the killing spree that resulted in seven dead, including the shooter, expect the usual cry: “More gun control.”

California has among the nation’s most stringent gun laws, including the closure of the so-called gun show loophole. Still, there will be demands that California lawmakers “do something.” California State Sen. Leland Yee, an ardent anti-gun pol, certainly did something. He got caught on tape talking with an undercover FBI agent tape about illegally trafficking firearms!

But we digress.

My first book, “The Ten Things You Can’t Say In America,” includes a chapter called “Gun Control Advocates -- Good Guys With Blood On Their Hands:

Here’s my explosive “interview” with the now CNN-departed Piers Morgan over guns:



President Obama ordered the CDC to study how often guns are used in self-defense. Last June, the CDC quietly released its report: Guns are used for self-defense at least as often as they are used improperly. The CDC even cited a study by Florida criminologist Gary Kleck, who argues that Americans use firearms for self defense -- every year -- about 2.5 million times.

Finally, I wrote this piece about the frequency of self-defense with a firearm:


Here’s an excerpt:

Criminologist Gary Kleck estimates that 2.5 million Americans use guns to defend themselves each year. Out of that number, 400,000 believe that but for their firearms, they would have been dead.

Professor Emeritus James Q. Wilson, the UCLA public policy expert, says: "We know from Census Bureau surveys that something beyond 100,000 uses of guns for self-defense occur every year. We know from smaller surveys of a commercial nature that the number may be as high as 2 1/2 or 3 million. We don't know what the right number is, but whatever the right number is, it's not a trivial number."

Former Manhattan Assistant District Attorney David P. Koppel studied gun control for the Cato Institute. Citing a 1979-1985 study by the National Crime Victimization Survey, Koppel found: "When a robbery victim does not defend himself, the robber succeeds 88 percent of the time, and the victim is injured 25 percent of the time. When a victim resists with a gun, the robbery success rate falls to 30 percent, and the victim injury rate falls to 17 percent. No other response to a robbery -- from drawing a knife to shouting for help to fleeing -- produces such low rates of victim injury and robbery success."

More gun laws will simply restrict the law-abiding, thus shifting power to the bad actors who ignore laws. We call them bad actors for a reason.

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

1 comment:

  1. Larry you are right as usual. This is not about gun control. This was a disturbed individual- and it will likely come out he was on anti-depressants, which most mass killers are as well- and likely contributes to their disassociative and violent behavior.
    It seems clear he should have been committed, but due to the changes in mental health laws (in the 80s) it would've been nearly impossible for him to be committed- please use your pulpit to bring attention to this part of the discussion that is almost always overlooked.

    ReplyDelete

Comment Policy:

The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.

This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.

The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.

To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.

Thank you for your attention.

The Elder Statement