By Larry Elder, Sep. 19, 2013
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.,
after another mass shooting, predictably wasted no time in demanding still more
gun control legislation.
This week, a killer with a valid ID
entered the Washington Navy Yard in southeast D.C., a military facility where
16,000 people -- mostly civilians -- work. He killed 12 people and wounded
several others at the Naval Sea Systems Command headquarters, where 3,000
people work.
The suspect, Aaron Alexis, who was
killed at the scene, was a 34-year-old former Navy reservist, employed by a
military contractor after an honorable discharge. It is unclear which of the
three firearms found near his body were brought in by Alexis -- or whether he
got them from security guards after he shot them.
Early reports on the shooting
claimed that Alexis used an AR-15 assault rifle, the same weapon used in other
mass shootings. Turns out there wasn't even an AR-15 at the crime scene. Still,
advocates call for more restrictions.
But Alexis' troubled background literally
screamed: "Red flag! Red flag!"
Alexis, a native New Yorker, had
been arrested three times from 2004 to 2010. The first occurred in Seattle,
when he shot out the tires on the truck of a construction worker who had
reportedly angered Alexis for "disrespecting" and "mocking"
him. Alexis told the police he had an anger-fueled "blackout" and
could not recall the incident. Alexis' father told the police that his son had
anger management issues and suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder as a
result of assisting "as an active participant in rescue attempts" of
9/11.
Seattle police booked and jailed
Alexis for malicious mischief and according to their paperwork, sent the case
to Seattle Municipal Court. But the Seattle City Attorney's office say they never
received a police report, so they never charged Alexis.
In August 2008, Alexis was arrested
on a charge of disorderly conduct in DeKalb County, Ga. "It appears he
might have spent a night in jail," said DeKalb County Police Chief Cedric
Alexander, "but ended up for forgiveness bond on a county ordinance."
The reports did not indicate any weapons were involved, said the chief.
Then in 2010, Fort Worth, Texas,
police arrested him for shooting his gun through the ceiling of his apartment.
The bullet went through the floor above and came within a few feet of a woman
living upstairs, according to the police report. Alexis told the police that
the gun accidently discharged as he was cleaning it while cooking dinner, but
the above-floor neighbor believed Alexis fired intentionally because he had
complained to her several times about her making too much noise. Again, no
charges filed.
And during his four-year military
career in the Navy Reserves, he was cited at least eight times for
"misconduct," including multiple unexcused absences and the rather
serious offenses of insubordination and disorderly conduct.
Why the "honorable"
discharge?
Did he get a pass from a military
not willing to take the trouble to get him discharged under less-than-honorable
conditions?
How does someone with three
arrests, two of which are gun-related, become a military contractor's employee?
How does someone with a military record that includes several citations for
"misconduct" pass security background checks, obtain a "secret"-level
security clearance, and get hired by a military contractor?
Were disqualifying factors
overlooked or minimized for fear that Alexis, a black man, would accuse the
military of racism?
Recall the case of Army Major Nidal
Hasan, the Muslim psychiatrist who murdered 13 on Nov. 4, 2009, at the military
base in Fort Hood. Colleagues reportedly feared him, thought he had anger
issues, and some even heard him express pro-jihadist sentiments. In the months
before the murders, intelligence agencies intercepted at least 18 emails
between Hasan and al-Qaida recruiter Anwar al-Awlaki, several discussing jihad.
Authorities took no action.
Did Hasan benefit from a fear an
investigation would provoke a charge of bias against Islam?
In Los Angeles, ex-LAPD cop
Christopher Dorner, a black man, went on a killing spree that resulted in the
deaths of five, including Dorner. He wrote and posted on his website an angry
"manifesto" that accused the LAPD of racism. Since the LAPD's stated
hiring goal is for a force that "represents the diversity of the
city," the best and most qualified do not necessarily get hired. In
Dorner's case, he became a cop despite run-ins during training at the police
academy, including an accusation of an accidental discharge of the
police-issued firearm.
Did Dorner benefit from the LAPD's
quest for "diversity''? Did political correctness and fear of being
accused of "profiling" allow Alexis, Hassan and Dorner to skate
through?
Finally, the Navy Yard, like Fort
Hood, has a no-gun rule. A 1993 military policy change under President Bill
Clinton effectively prohibited guns on military bases. Only military police
posted at entry or other security points are armed.
Rather than a poster child for more
gun control, Alexis looks like a case study of how political correctness -- in
a gun-free zone -- can get people killed.
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"LIke" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement