Thursday, August 14, 2014

When Blacks Voted 80 Percent Dem, Malcolm X Called Them 'Chumps'

By Larry Elder

For giving 80 percent of their vote to the Democratic Party, black activist Malcolm X, in 1964, called black voters "political chumps."  

White voters, X said, “are so evenly divided that every time they vote, the race is so close they have to go back and count the votes all over again. Which means that any bloc, any minority that has a bloc that sticks together is in a strategic position. Either way you go, that’s who gets it.”

Yet Democrats, said Malcolm X, failed to deliver on a promised and much anticipated new civil rights bill knowing the party could still count on their blind support in the next election.
“You put them first,” said Malcolm X, “and they put you last. ‘Cause you’re a chump. A political chump! … Any time you throw your weight behind a political party that controls two-thirds of the government, and that party can’t keep the promise that it made to you during election time, and you are dumb enough to walk around continuing to identify yourself with that party -- you’re not only a chump but you’re a traitor to your race.”

What would Malcolm X say about today’s 95 percent black vote? Did the Democratic Party keep its promises to promote family stability, push education and encourage job creation?

The black community, over the last 50 years, has suffered an unparalleled breakdown in family unity. Even during slavery when marriage was illegal, a black child was more likely than today to be raised under a roof with his or her biological mother and father. According to census data, from 1890 to 1940, said economist Walter Williams, a black child was slightly more likely to grow up with married parents than a white child. 

What happened?

When President Lyndon Johnson launched the "war on poverty" in 1965, 24 percent of black babies were born to unmarried mothers. Today that number is 72 percent. Then-presidential candidate Barack Obama said in 2008: “Children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison. They are more likely to have behavioral problems, or run away from home, or become teenage parents themselves.”

Not only has family breakdown coincided with increased government spending, but the money has not done much to reduce the rate of poverty. From 1965 until now, the government has spent $15-20 trillion to fight poverty. In 1949, the poverty rate stood at 34 percent, by 1965 it was cut in half, to 17 percent -- all before the so-called war on poverty. But after the war began in 1965, poverty began to flat line. It appears that the generous welfare system allowed women to, in essence, marry the government -- and it allowed men to abandon their financial and moral responsibility, while surrendering the dignity that comes from being a good provider. Psychologists call dependency "learned helplessness."
About the importance of education, Malcolm X once said, “My alma mater was books, a good library. …I could spend the rest of my life reading, just satisfying my curiosity.” What would he say about the Democratic opposition to school vouchers -- where the money would follow the student rather than the other way around?
Urban schools, where students are disproportionately black and brown, are simply not producing children who can read, write and compute at grade level. The drop-out rate can approach 50 percent in some urban districts. Nationwide, 10 percent of parents send their kids to private school. But in cities like Philadelphia and Chicago, 40 percent or more of teachers send their own kids to private schools.
Democrats don't do blacks any favor by supporting “race-based preferences” in admissions to colleges and universities. Turns out, the more a school lowers standards to achieve "diversity," the greater the chance the "diverse" student drops out.
More than that, Democrats have convinced blacks that but for race-based preferences, black growth would suffer. Nonsense. Respected researchers Stephan and Abigail Thernstrom wrote: "The growth of the black middle class long predates the adoption of race-conscious social policies. In some ways, indeed, the black middle class was expanding more rapidly before 1970 than after.”
Finally, as to the economy, then-chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo., admitted: “With 14 percent (black) unemployment, if we had a white president we’d be marching around the White House. …The President knows we are going to act in deference to him in a way we wouldn’t to someone white.”
Democratic policies have contributed to family breakdown; maintained underperforming urban schools -- with no opt out for parents; and have promoted tax-spend-and-regulate economic policies that have resulted in a level of unemployment described as “unconscionable” by Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus.
So would Malcolm X call today’s black voter a political "chump" -- or a political “traitor”?

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"LIke" Larry Elder on Facebook


  1. Mr. Elder,

    Let me preface my question/statement by saying I'm a huge fan of yours. And admittedly, this comes from a registered democrat. That isn't to suggest that I'm a "liberal." I consider myself quite moderate, both in the sense that I agree with each side of the aisle on particular issues and in the sense that I'm somewhere in between both platforms on others. If anything, I view the polarization of American politics as one of this nation's greatest failures. The promotion of what's best for a party over what's best for a nation is far too commonplace in my opinion. But by weighting certain issues above others, I admittedly vote Democratic more frequently than I do Republican.

    With that context in mind, I have been a big fan of your willingness to engage in a dialogue on issues of race where few others seem willing to wade in. I'm a firm believer that many of the problems in the black community arise from a collective mindset that's been instilled in them that if their lives and position in society aren't to their liking, it's purely the fault of society at large. This is a crippling mentality and one which the liberal platform propagates. However, my question isn't about the rightness/wrongness of blacks voting Democratic. My question is, shouldn't the greater concern be that a group as geographically, economically, religiously, culturally, etc diverse as black Americans vote en bloc at all? Personally, I agree completely with your assertion that many blacks would be better served not supporting the Democratic Party. However, I believe many would. The greater evil in my opinion is the inability of any community to properly evaluate their beliefs and opinions individually while instead relying on the group mentality to do it for them. Would you not agree that this is the greater concern? That blacks feel that their race motivates them to HAVE to vote Democratic?

  2. If you vote Democrat (Party of Slavery!) then you must be a moocher...

    Why would ANY descendent of Democrat Party championed slavery vote for the Party of Slavery?

    The whole world wonders...


Comment Policy:

The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.

This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.

The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.

To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.

Thank you for your attention.

The Elder Statement