Thursday, August 25, 2016

Trump Speaks, Media Translates

By Town Hall, Aug 25, 2016 

"Do you ever get tired of defending Donald Trump?" a critic asked.

It isn't that Donald Trump does not say things that are cringe-worthy. It's that his opponent, Hillary Rodham Clinton, says and does things even more cringe-worthy. So forgive those who feel that Trump's supposedly "outrageous" statements are nothing more than selective outrage, double standards, and the typical "Republicans are racist" meme. Democrats routinely say vulgar, bigoted, divisive, outrageous things while getting a toll-free pass.

It wasn't Donald Trump, but Donna Brazile, then Al Gore's campaign manager, who said Republicans have a "white-boy attitude."

It wasn't Donald Trump, but Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri, who said, after Hurricane Katrina, "George (W.) Bush let people die on rooftops in New Orleans because they were poor and because they were black."

It wasn't Donald Trump, but Vice President Joe Biden, who, before a mostly black audience, criticized then-Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and Republican resistance to Wall Street regulation, saying: "He's going to let the big banks once again write their own rules -- unchain Wall Street! They're going to put y'all back in chains!"

It wasn't Trump, but then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, who told a black church audience, "When you look at the way the (Republican-majority) House of Representatives has been run, it has been run like a plantation -- and you know what I'm talking about!"

It wasn't Donald Trump, but Debbie Wasserman Schultz, then the chair of the Democratic National Committee, who said that Republicans "want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws." She also said, "The focus of the Republican Party on turning back the clock for women really is something that's unacceptable and shows how callous and insensitive they are towards women's priorities." And just last month, she tweeted, "Donald Trump and the GOP want to turn back the clock on civil rights and women. We won't allow it."

It wasn't Donald Trump, but Howard Dean, then-chair of the DNC, who referred to the Republican Party as "the white" party.

This brings us to one of Trump's most recent alleged "outrages." During a campaign speech, Trump warned that Clinton's election could mean several more left-wing justices on the Supreme Court, threatening the individual right to keep and bear arms. After all, in the 2008 Heller decision, four justices supported regulation that came very close to outlawing the home possession of a firearm. At a fundraiser last year Clinton said, "We've got to go after this. ... the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment. And I am going to make that case every chance I get." Later a top Clinton adviser said, "Clinton believes Heller was wrongly decided." Doesn't all of this explain why Second Amendment supporters are worried and confused?

What exactly did Trump say? He said, "Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish, the Second Amendment. ... And if she gets to pick her judges -- nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people -- maybe there is, I don't know."

The reaction was swift. Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut sent out several tweets. Tweet No. 1: "Casual reading assignment tonight: federal criminal statute on threatening to kill a candidate for President." Tweet No. 2: "Was (Donald Trump) suggesting his supporters shoot Hillary? Shoot her nominee? Who knows. It's all so disgusting and embarrassing and sad." Tweet No. 3: "This isn't play. Unstable people with powerful guns and an unhinged hatred for Hillary are listening to you, (Donald Trump)." Tweet No. 4: "Don't treat this as a political misstep. It's an assassination threat, seriously upping the possibility of a national tragedy & crisis."

It takes some kind of mind to interpret that as a call to urge supporters to murder Clinton. But the media was already off and running with its storyline: Trump, if he lost the election to Hillary, had urged supporters to kill her.

So, for your convenience, here is the Media Trump Translator:

Trump: "Lovely smile." Media translation: "I wish they'd bring back slavery!"

Trump: "Good morning." Media translation: "It's a great day to organize a posse and burn down mosques!"

Trump: "Pass the salt." Media translation: "Drink hemlock, you scumbag!"

Trump: "Nice tie." Media translation: "Your granddaughter should be beheaded!"

Trump: "How are you?" Media translation: "I pray that your wife gets ovarian cancer."

Trump: "How about that Michael Phelps?" Media translation: "May your sister get raped by an ISIS lieutenant with the Zika virus."

Trump: "It's raining cats and dogs." Media translation: "As president, I will force-euthanize all family pets."

Not only does Trump, like all Republicans, face Hollywood, academia and media, but reportedly Google, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram are somehow manipulating social media to promote Clinton and denigrate Trump.

 The good news is that there are less than 90 days to go before election time. The bad news is that the Trump pile-on increases the odds of Hillary Rodham Clinton becoming the next president.

Read More:

Join us - become an Elderado today at:

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter

"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook


  1. Only those dimwits would just rely on media's "translations", rather than exercising critical thinking and facts findings. Dimwits will vote for Hillary.

  2. And left wing media is an echo chamber of the same propaganda. I first noticed it when they said Cheney adds " Gravitas" to the Bush ticket. I then saw the word parroted over and over. Next was the Israel retaliation for missile attacks. It was called " Disproportionate Response". Its as if one person writes the theme and sends it by email to the others. Like Ezra Klein with Journo-List


Comment Policy:

The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.

This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.

The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.

To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.

Thank you for your attention.

The Elder Statement