Thursday, December 10, 2015

U.S. Immigration Law Is Racist Enough To Allow Trump’s Muslim Visitor Ban


By Roque Planas, Dec 08, 2015 Huffington Post

GOP presidential hopeful Donald Trump’s proposal to ban all Muslims worldwide from visiting the United States isn’t likely to go anywhere. Met with wide criticism from both the left and the right, Trump’s proposal is overtly discriminatory and would be virtually impossible to enforce.
But experts consulted by The Huffington Post say it would be legal for the U.S. to enact such sweeping restrictions without violating the Constitution because the Supreme Court has upheld flatly racist immigration restrictions in the past.
Most notably, in 1889 the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Chinese Exclusion Act, a law passed in 1882 to prohibit Chinese laborers from entering the United States.
The U.S. had recruited laborers from China since the 1840s, according to Natsu Taylor Saito, a professor of law at Georgia State University. But in response to economic depression, Congress voted in 1882 to ban Chinese laborers from immigrating to the U.S. for 10 years. The Chinese Exclusion Act also forbade Chinese migrants from becoming American citizens.

 
Read More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com

Join us - become an Elderado today at:
LarryElder.com

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter

"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

1 comment:

  1. GOP presidential hopeful Donald Trump’s proposal to ban all Muslims worldwide from visiting the United States isn’t likely to go anywhere. Met with wide criticism from both the left and the right, Trump’s proposal is overtly discriminatory and would be virtually impossible to enforce.legal case management software for government attorneys

    ReplyDelete

Comment Policy:

The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.

This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.

The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.

To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.

Thank you for your attention.

The Elder Statement