I understand what Leigh Alexander was trying to say in her now-infamous “Gamers Are Over” article. She was trying to say that video games have evolved, that they’re no longer in the jurisdiction of so-called nerds, and that ‘gamer-culture’ as we know it has expanded.
That’s why she writes things like this: “Developers and writers alike want games about more things, and games by more people. We want — and we are getting, and will keep getting — tragicomedy, vignette, musicals, dream worlds, family tales, ethnographies, abstract art. We will get this, because we’re creating culture now. We are refusing to let anyone feel prohibited from participating.”
Alexander sees a broader culture for video games, one that includes more avant garde fare; one that involves more than the traditional shooters and platformers; and one that culture writers like Alexander herself could explore on a deeper level.
I get that this is what she was trying to say, and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with saying that. After all, gaming has evolved. Video games are more diverse than ever. I enjoy a broad spectrum of opinions and topics. I enjoy that we can talk about video games as a crucial piece of our culture and economy. I also enjoy talking about game mechanics, graphics, and systems. All the little building blocks of these technological achievements.
Leigh's inflammatory twitter comments alone lead me to believe she's saying a little bit more than that. But to each their own I suppose.
ReplyDelete