.png)
St. Louis County Says, Oops, No Surge In Ferguson Voter Registration
WASHINGTON -- The St. Louis County Board of Elections said Tuesday that officials had erroneously compiled numbers showing a surge in voter registration since a police officer shot unarmed teenager Michael Brown in August. The actual figures on new voters in Ferguson, Missouri, are much lower than previously announced.
Officials said earlier this month that 3,287 residents of Ferguson had registered to vote since the shooting, a significant number for a town with a population of 21,203, according to the last census.
On Tuesday, however, St. Louis County Director of Elections Rita Day said that only 128 people have registered to vote since the shooting. Day explained that the elections board had used the wrong state database to compile the numbers, consulting a report on people changing residence rather than a report on voter registration.
"It was a mistake that we made," Day told The Huffington Post in an interview. "I do apologize for that and I accept that responsibility."
Day said that after the discrepancy was discovered, officials spent two days on the phone with the Missouri Secretary of State's Office to correct the matter.
Laura Swinford, a spokeswoman for the Secretary of State's Office, confirmed the new voter registration numbers later on Tuesday. She said:
By Igor Bobic, Oct. 7, 2014, Huffingtonpost.com
WASHINGTON -- The St. Louis County Board of Elections said Tuesday that officials had erroneously compiled numbers showing a surge in voter registration since a police officer shot unarmed teenager Michael Brown in August. The actual figures on new voters in Ferguson, Missouri, are much lower than previously announced.
Officials said earlier this month that 3,287 residents of Ferguson had registered to vote since the shooting, a significant number for a town with a population of 21,203, according to the last census.
On Tuesday, however, St. Louis County Director of Elections Rita Day said that only 128 people have registered to vote since the shooting. Day explained that the elections board had used the wrong state database to compile the numbers, consulting a report on people changing residence rather than a report on voter registration.
"It was a mistake that we made," Day told The Huffington Post in an interview. "I do apologize for that and I accept that responsibility."
Day said that after the discrepancy was discovered, officials spent two days on the phone with the Missouri Secretary of State's Office to correct the matter.
Laura Swinford, a spokeswoman for the Secretary of State's Office, confirmed the new voter registration numbers later on Tuesday. She said:
"St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners simply ran the wrong report. We were happy to assist board of elections staff when they requested our help, and we can confirm there were 128 newly registered voters in Ferguson from August 11th to October 6th. This is a good time to remind all eligible Missourians that the deadline to register to vote in the November 4th general election is tomorrow, October 8th."Read the full story: www.huffingtonpost.com
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement