By Kathleen Matigan, Jun. 6, 2014, Wsj.com
1. THE LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE REMAINS LOW
The steady jobless rate, at 6.3%, may be masking more labor slack in the adult U.S. population. The labor force participation rate—a datapoint followed at the Federal Reserve—held at a decades-low of 62.8% in May. While some of the shrinking labor force reflects boomers retiring, the severe recession and weak recovery have also played a part. Economists think that absent the recession, the labor force-participation rate would be 64.6%
2. NO RENAISSANCE FOR MANUFACTURING JOBS
The manufacturing sector may be enjoying a renaissance, thanks in part to cheaper U.S. energy. But the gain in output has mainly come from more automation and productivity. Manufacturers may be booking new orders, but they aren’t hiring many new workers. Factory payrolls rose just 10,000 in May. Since the recovery began in mid-2009, factory output is up more than 25%; payrolls just over 3%.
3. HOURS WORKED IMPLIES FASTER GDP, OR SLOWER PRODUCTIVITY, IN 2Q
Alan Levenson, chief economist at T. Rowe Price, points out aggregated hours worked by production workers is growing at a 4.0% annual rate so far in the second quarter. Aggregate hours are viewed as an input into economic growth. So, the jump in hours means either gross domestic product is growing faster than the 3.5% or so rate economists are expecting. Or all of that output is being generated by new labor, and productivity will be weak again this quarter.
1. THE LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE REMAINS LOW
The steady jobless rate, at 6.3%, may be masking more labor slack in the adult U.S. population. The labor force participation rate—a datapoint followed at the Federal Reserve—held at a decades-low of 62.8% in May. While some of the shrinking labor force reflects boomers retiring, the severe recession and weak recovery have also played a part. Economists think that absent the recession, the labor force-participation rate would be 64.6%
2. NO RENAISSANCE FOR MANUFACTURING JOBS
The manufacturing sector may be enjoying a renaissance, thanks in part to cheaper U.S. energy. But the gain in output has mainly come from more automation and productivity. Manufacturers may be booking new orders, but they aren’t hiring many new workers. Factory payrolls rose just 10,000 in May. Since the recovery began in mid-2009, factory output is up more than 25%; payrolls just over 3%.
3. HOURS WORKED IMPLIES FASTER GDP, OR SLOWER PRODUCTIVITY, IN 2Q
Alan Levenson, chief economist at T. Rowe Price, points out aggregated hours worked by production workers is growing at a 4.0% annual rate so far in the second quarter. Aggregate hours are viewed as an input into economic growth. So, the jump in hours means either gross domestic product is growing faster than the 3.5% or so rate economists are expecting. Or all of that output is being generated by new labor, and productivity will be weak again this quarter.
Read all five: www.blogs.wsj.com
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement