By Larry Elder, Jun. 18, 2009
45 million Americans lack health care insurance. Or do they?
A pro-"universal health care" television host recently cited this widely accepted "fact." The number is bogus.
45 million Americans lack health care insurance. Or do they?
A pro-"universal health care" television host recently cited this widely accepted "fact." The number is bogus.
Here's the skinny.
Start with the math. We have 300 million Americans.
Subtract the 45 million — 15 percent of us — with no health insurance. That
leaves 255 million Americans, or 85 percent, with it.
And the insurance is lousy, right? Not according to a 2006
ABC News/Kaiser Family Foundation/USA Today survey. It found that 89 percent of
Americans were satisfied with the quality of their own health care.
Nearly half of the 45 million fall in the category of my
26-year-old nephew. He smokes cigarettes, dates, eats out, goes to movies and,
like all young people, lives through his cell phone. With a slight change in
priorities, he could afford health insurance, the cost of which at his age and
health starts at about $100 a month. Take a look at a Reason Foundation video
(reason.tv) of interviews with a bunch of
non-health-insured 20-somethings.
These Gen Xers copped to dropping money on clothes, booze,
nightlife, the latest tech gizmos and other things of interest to them. With a
change in priorities, these young folks — far more representative of those
without insurance than the forlorn husband and wife sitting on a porch swing —
could both afford and qualify for health insurance. They simply consider it a
low priority.
Millions more can access health care — through SCHIP (State
Children's Health Insurance Program), Medicaid or other government programs.
But for whatever reason, 11 million people simply refuse to take advantage of
them.
Several million other Americans who want insurance do,
indeed, go without it — for a time. Many are, however, between jobs, and most —
at some point — will find employment that either offers health insurance or
pays enough so that they can buy it. Millions more work at companies that offer
health insurance, and for a few dollars out of every paycheck, they could add
family members. They choose not to.
What about criminals without insurance? More than 2 million
Americans — with access to health care, by the way — use jail, prison or penitentiary
mailing addresses. And for every one behind bars, how many live among us who
survive by theft, drug dealing, prostitution or some similar career path?
Taxpayer health insurance for them, too?
So now we're down to the Americans without health insurance
on a persistent, long-term basis. This is approximately 10-15 million, a big
number to be sure. But does this warrant a government takeover of the entire
health care system?
Lacking health care insurance is not the same as lacking
health care . By law, most emergency rooms must provide health care — to both
legals and illegals. Yes, they stand in line, but no health insurance does not
equal no health care.
Government (aka taxpayers) already pays half of our health
care dollar, with programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and other federal
and state plans. The stated goals are accessibility and affordability. Congress
passed Medicare in 1965. In the 20 years before the program's inception, the
cost of a day in a hospital increased threefold. In the 20 years following
Medicare, a day in a hospital increased eightfold — substantially higher than
inflation over that period. Because of cost controls on government plans,
providers increased the cost on everybody else.
So here's the question.
Do we allow a complete government takeover of the section
of health care it doesn't already run, for 10-15 million or so without health
insurance on a persistent basis? Again, 255 million Americans already have it.
Many millions more could get it if they wanted to. And 89 percent of Americans
are satisfied with the care they now receive.
What to do? Unleash the free market. Allow greater
competition among health care providers. Decrease costly regulations that
increase the price tag. Enable consumers to purchase insurance plans across
state lines. Allow non-government-licensed paraprofessionals and others —
currently prevented by law from offering any medical services — to provide
low-cost care.
What about poor care and negligence? We have laws against
force and fraud, as well as a common-law duty of care. That's why God created
lawyers. (Just give us "loser pays.")
What about those who cannot afford it? What about those
with pre-existing illnesses whose insurance applications carriers turned down?
What's wrong with charity — people helping people? America remains the most
generous nation on the face of the earth. We donate more of our time and money
than countries like England, Germany and Japan. During the Great Depression,
before the New Deal, charitable giving skyrocketed. After the New Deal,
charitable giving continued, but not at nearly the same rate. People expected
government to address the problem, and taxpayers felt they gave at the office.
We can provide such "universal" coverage at a
"low cost" — through rationing. That means long lines, lower quality
and less innovation for services that Americans currently take for granted.
Economists call it T.A.N.S.T.A.A.F.L. There ain't no such
thing as a free lunch.
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement