By Larry Elder, Oct. 17, 2013
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
Guy walks into a restaurant. Says
to the waitress, "I'd like some scrambled eggs and some kind words."
She brings the eggs. The guy smiles, "Now how about the kind words?"
Waitress whispers, "Don't eat the eggs."
This brings us to the fact that
urban public school teachers are about two times more likely than non-teachers
to send their own children to private schools. In other words, many public
school teachers whisper to parents, "Don't eat the eggs."
About 11 percent of all parents --
nationwide, rural and urban -- send their children to private schools. The
numbers are much higher in urban areas. One study found that in Philadelphia a
staggering 44 percent of public school teachers send their own kids to private schools.
In Cincinnati and Chicago, 41 and 39 percent of public school teachers,
respectively, pay for a private school education for their children. In
Rochester, New York, it's 38 percent. In Baltimore it's 35 percent, San
Francisco is 34 percent and New York-Northeastern New Jersey is 33 percent. In
Los Angeles nearly 25 percent of public school teachers send their kids to
private school versus 16 percent of Angelenos who do so.
The study, conducted in 2004 by the
Fordham Institute, said: "These findings ... are apt to be embarrassing
for teacher unions, considering those organizations' political animus toward
assisting families to select among schools. But these results do not surprise
most practicing teachers to whom we speak. ... The data have shown the same
basic pattern since we first happened upon them two decades ago: Urban public
school teachers are more apt to send their own children to private schools than
is the general public. One might say this shows how conservative teachers are.
They continue doing what they've always done. Or it might indicate that they
have long been discerning connoisseurs of education. ...
"The middle class will
tolerate a lot -- disorder, decay, and dismay, an unwholesome environment,
petty crime, potholes, chicanery and rudeness. One thing, however, that middle
class parents will not tolerate is bad schools for their children. To escape
them, they will pay out-of-pocket or vote with their feet. That is what
discerning teachers do."
What about members of Congress?
Where do they send their own children?
A 2007 Heritage Foundation study
found that 37 percent of representatives and 45 percent of senators with
school-age children sent their own kids to private school. Of the members of
the Congressional Hispanic Caucus with school-age children, 38 percent sent
them to private school. Of the members of the Congressional Black Caucus with
school-age children, 52 percent sent them to private school.
The ex-mayor of Los Angeles,
Antonio Villaraigosa, was asked why he did not have his own kids in public
school despite his strong advocacy of public education. Villaraigosa, whose
wife was a public school teacher, said, "I'm doing like every parent does.
I'm going to put my kids in the best school I can. My kids were in a neighborhood
public school until just this year. We've decided to put them in a Catholic
school. We've done that because we want our kids to have the best education
they can. If I can get that education in a public school, I'll do it, but I
won't (SET ITAL)sacrifice(END ITAL) (emphasis added) my children any more than
I could ask you to do the same."
When he got elected president,
Barack Obama and his wife made a big display of looking into D.C. public
schools for his two daughters to attend. But the Obamas chose Sidwell Friends,
the elite private school whose alums include Chelsea Clinton. Obama's own
mother sent the then-10-year-old to live with her parents -- so he could attend
Punahou Academy, the most exclusive prep school on the island. In fact, from
Punahou to Occidental (a private college in Los Angeles) to Columbia (where he
completed college) to Harvard Law, Obama is a product of private education.
So how does this square with
Obama's opposition to the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program that offered a
voucher for the children of participating parents? It doesn't.
Here's what Obama's Office of
Management and Budget said about the program: "Rigorous evaluation over
several years demonstrates that the D.C. program has not yielded improved
student achievement by its scholarship recipients compared to other students in
D.C."
Tell that to the
educator/consultant the Department of Education hired to evaluate the program.
Testifying before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security, Patrick Wolf, a
University of Arkansas education policy professor who spent more than 10 years
evaluating school choice programs in D.C., Milwaukee, New York and Dayton,
Ohio, said, "In my opinion, by ... boosting high school graduation rates
and generating a wealth of evidence suggesting that students also benefited in
reading achievement, the D.C. OSP has accomplished what few educational
interventions can claim: It markedly improved important education outcomes for
low-income inner-city students."
President Barack Obama calls
education "the civil rights issue of our time." Yet, his opposition
to K-12 education vouchers guarantees that many of America's kids will sit in
back of the bus.
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"LIke" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement