By Brent Bozel III, Sep. 12, 2011, Special to The Washington Times
I lost my television debate virginity to Tom Braden,
the old curmudgeon liberal counterpart to Pat Buchanan,
on the original CNN“Crossfire”
series. His first question was a haymaker: “Who the hell do you think you are
passing judgment on journalists?” he snarled. Little did I know this was the
official Denial Excuse
No. 12 in an endless litany of media denials of what everyone knows, but only
they continue to deny: The “news” media are drowning in a liberal political
bias. Enter into the fray UCLA
professor Tim Groseclose
with “Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind,” with a new
methodology to measure that bias.
I confess that at the outset I wasn’t too keen about doing this
review. The Media Research
Center, which I head, has conducted more studies on this subject
than any other institution on the planet over the past quarter-century, so I
turned to the “Left Turn” index out of curiosity to see which ones were chosen
for citation. (Clear throat here: Ahem.) Not a one. Worse, where the index
cites the MRC,
in one instance it misidentifies the group; and in the other, allegedly over
three pages, it’s a phantom citation - the MRC
isn’t there at all. But I had agreed to review this book, so I read it. On the
whole, I liked it.
Mr. Groseclose
argues that one can measure liberal media bias through objective and
quantitative statistical analysis, that “every [emphasis his] mainstream
national news outlet in the United States has a liberal bias,” that out of more
than 100 major news outlets studied, only a handful lean to the right and none
of the supposedly conservative news outlets is far right.
There is a whole lot of math going on here, and some of the
statistical jargon is pure mumbo-jumbo that the layman just must accept, (“To
find the pseudo intercept rendezvous parameters b, k and the radial distance d
between circular orbits,” “endogeneity problems” and the like), so out of
necessity, I will simplify (and the author might well accuse me of
oversimplifying). Mr. Groseclose
first introduces us to the “PQ” analysis, the “political quotient” that
measures the degree to which a person is liberal.
Mr. Groseclose
measures the PQs of members of Congress by studying their
roll-call votes; for others, he offers a self-testing series of questions. Rep. Michele
Bachmann (minus 4.1) and Sen. Jim DeMint
(4.8) are on one end and Rep. Barney
Frank (103.8) and Ronald V.
Dellums (107.4) fall on the other. Next, the author conducts the
“SQ” analysis, measuring the “slant quotient” of media outlets based on their
source material, i.e., which policy think tanks they turn to for their
citations. Thus, the author concludes that the New York Times has a 74 SQ, on
par with the 74 PQ of Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut independent.
Later in the book, Mr. Groseclose
introduces another measuring device, estimating the bias based on an analysis
of the facts reported about certain issues, when there are facts supporting
both the liberal and conservative position
Read the full review: www.washingtontimes.com
"Left Turn" is available on Amazon.com
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"LIke" Larry Elder on Facebook












No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement