By George Harbison, Feb. 7, 2014, Forbes.com
Bill O’Reilly’s contradictory economic worldview was on stark display last Wednesday evening during the presentation of his “Talking Points Memo” on The O’Reilly Factor. This particular “Talking Points Memo” dealt with President Obama’s State of the Union Address. O’Reilly began his commentary with this:
O’Reilly rightfully chastised the president for repeating this hackneyed canard, stating correctly that this income discrepancy can be easily explained away by adjusting for the fact that men tend to work longer hours than women, tend to be in more highly unionized industries, and enter higher paying occupations. He could also have noted the impact on women’s income of temporarily exiting the workforce while raising their children. O’Reilly also pointed out, correctly, that there has been a federal law on the books since 1963 prohibiting gender-based pay inequality.
Bill O’Reilly’s contradictory economic worldview was on stark display last Wednesday evening during the presentation of his “Talking Points Memo” on The O’Reilly Factor. This particular “Talking Points Memo” dealt with President Obama’s State of the Union Address. O’Reilly began his commentary with this:
The President’s address last night was heavy on grievance, that is, discussing Americans who are not doing as well as other Americans. The President is promising to fix that. It’s almost like he’s a teacher with favorite students. Last night, American women fell into that category. As you may know, the President wants more income fairness. He wants to lessen the gap between rich Americans and working Americans. Now, that’s a noble goal if it comes about in the private marketplace. But, an imposition into private earnings by the feds goes directly against our capitalistic system. Nevertheless, the President and the Democratic Party have targeted American women as a group that needs help.” (Emphasis added.)O’Reilly then challenged this statement from President Obama’s speech: “Today, women make up about half our workforce. But they still make 77 cents for every dollar a man earns. That is wrong, and in 2014, it’s an embarrassment. A woman deserves equal pay for equal work.”
O’Reilly rightfully chastised the president for repeating this hackneyed canard, stating correctly that this income discrepancy can be easily explained away by adjusting for the fact that men tend to work longer hours than women, tend to be in more highly unionized industries, and enter higher paying occupations. He could also have noted the impact on women’s income of temporarily exiting the workforce while raising their children. O’Reilly also pointed out, correctly, that there has been a federal law on the books since 1963 prohibiting gender-based pay inequality.
Read the full story: www.forbes.com
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement