Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Beverly Hills Hotel Celebrity Boycott—Who Is It Really Hurting? --On the other hand, shall we ignore inhumane laws?

By Mark Seal, Jul. 2014, Vanityfair.com

There once was a palace of movie stars and swimming pools, painted in shades of pink and green. A benevolent sultan with unfathomable riches from a faraway land bought it and lorded over its storied domain, while his managers and staff ensured that all within its doors were treated as royalty.

For 102 years, the Beverly Hills Hotel existed in a storybook space. The city of Beverly Hills literally grew up around it, and the stars and power brokers of the city made it their second home. Then “a grenade,” in the words of one of the hotel’s principals, was hurled into the hotel. Not an actual grenade, but a weapon of words and ideology.

The Sultan of Brunei, who since 1992 has owned the Beverly Hills as part of his Dorchester Collection, which includes nine other luxury hotels, announced in October 2013 that he was adopting the harsh and ancient Islamic penal code called Sharia in his country. Sharia calls for, among other punishments, public flogging of women who have abortions and amputation of limbs and death by stoning of homosexuals, adulterers, and thieves. The United Nations Human Rights Council urged the sultan and his ministers to reconsider, but thus far he has refused to back down.

Six months after the sultan’s announcement, the sleeping dragon of Hollywood awakened in a wave of activism seldom seen before. First came protests, then boycotts of the Beverly Hills Hotel. Stars, agents, and deal-makers who once packed the Polo Lounge, the hotel’s famed restaurant and bar, went instead to the Peninsula Hotel and Four Seasons. Tweets, Instagram messages, and opinion pieces by Ellen DeGeneres and Elton John, among others, ensured that the boycott went viral. “If we lived in Brunei, as of next year, we wouldn’t be getting married in front of our sons,” Elton John and his husband, David Furnish, wrote on the Huffington Post. “We’d be getting beaten to death, with objects, by a mob arranged and authorized by the government.”

By late May, the hotel had lost $2 million in cancellations, and the damage had radiated to the sultan’s other Dorchester Collection hotels, including the Dorchester, in London, and Le Meurice, in Paris, where the fashion industry, led by Anna Wintour, of Vogue, Hedi Slimane, of Yves Saint Laurent, and billionaire businessman François-Henri Pinault, as well as Virgin-airlines founder Richard Branson, vowed not to step inside a Dorchester Collection hotel. Mark Fabiani, a public-relations crisis manager, whose clients include Bill Clinton and Lance Armstrong, was hired by the hotel company to do damage control. And saying he was “devastated” and “surprised” that the Beverly Hills Hotel and the other Dorchester Collection properties would be boycotted, Christopher Cowdray, C.E.O. of the hotel group, flew in from London in an attempt to stanch the bleeding.

When I checked into the Beverly Hills Hotel in late May, the protesters were gone, but the boycott had taken its toll. The hotel wasn’t empty, but it was devoid of those who count in Hollywood.


Read the full story:   www.vanityfair.com

Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment Policy:

The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.

This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.

The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.

To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.

Thank you for your attention.

The Elder Statement