.png)
Tone deaf? Fear of powerful special interests?
Or was it simply an overt expression of disdain for an independent judiciary and a historic court ruling on behalf of mostly poor and minority students?
To whatever it can be attributed, just days after Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Rolf Treu issued a ruling on the unconstitutionality of five employment laws affecting teacher hiring and dismissal, including tenure, California legislators continued with business as usual. At the June 18 Senate Education Committee hearing, Assembly member Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego, argued for passage of Assembly Bill 1619 to expand permanent employment status (tenure) to school districts serving fewer than 250 students, currently exempted due to their small size.
It was a disturbing public display of the disconnect between Sacramento politicians and the majority of Californians, who support reform of teacher employment and dismissal laws that have made it too easy to hire ineffective teachers and too hard to fire them – even when they have committed egregious acts of criminal misconduct against kids.
Despite past efforts to reform these laws, it took nine brave children – backed by education reformers – to file a civil rights lawsuit, Vergara v. California, seeking to invalidate five laws exacerbating the inequitable access to quality teachers in California’s classrooms.
Prior to the ruling,the Gonzalez bill had sailed through the Assembly.
One might think Judge Treu’s ruling would prompt Gonzalez to halt her efforts to expand laws just ruled unconstitutional. After all, she is a talented legislator representing a significant number of poor and Latino children in her San Diego district. But prior to her election to the Legislature, she headed the San Diego labor federation and is heavily backed by the California Teachers Association. Indeed, she appeared oblivious to the ruling that has generated national attention.
In a rare setback to the teachers union, the bill failed in the Senate Education Committee – but only because two Democrats, Sens. Lou Correa of Santa Ana and Loni Hancock of Berkeley abstained, and three Republicans voted no. All other Democrats – including the committee chair – continued to pay homage to the union’s clout and voted in favor.
Nonetheless, the bill could get a reconsideration vote as early as Wednesday.
Read the full story: www.ocregister.com
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement