By Mike Reicher, Apr. 22, 2014, L.A. Daily News
A Los Angeles Department of Water and Power union official plans to appeal after a judge made a final ruling Tuesday that validated subpoenas in a city controller’s audit, said an attorney for Brian D’Arcy, the business manager of the IBEW, Local 18
Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant ruled that City Controller Ron Galperin has the authority to audit the Joint Safety Institute and the Joint Training Institute, two trusts managed jointly by the union and DWP administrators, and that the subpoenas are valid. City officials want to know how the trusts spent $40 million of ratepayer funds, but D’Arcy argued the money was not public and sought to quash the subpoenas for financial records. The judge disagreed.
D’Arcy’s attorney, D. William Heine, said the judgment wouldn’t be enforced during the appeal process.
“We are confident the Court of Appeal will reverse the judgment and rule that the controller does not have the authority to audit these joint labor management trusts created in collective bargaining for the benefit of the employees represented by Local 18,” Heine said.
In March, Chalfant made a tentative ruling against D’Arcy.
Source: www.dailynews.com
A Los Angeles Department of Water and Power union official plans to appeal after a judge made a final ruling Tuesday that validated subpoenas in a city controller’s audit, said an attorney for Brian D’Arcy, the business manager of the IBEW, Local 18
Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant ruled that City Controller Ron Galperin has the authority to audit the Joint Safety Institute and the Joint Training Institute, two trusts managed jointly by the union and DWP administrators, and that the subpoenas are valid. City officials want to know how the trusts spent $40 million of ratepayer funds, but D’Arcy argued the money was not public and sought to quash the subpoenas for financial records. The judge disagreed.
D’Arcy’s attorney, D. William Heine, said the judgment wouldn’t be enforced during the appeal process.
“We are confident the Court of Appeal will reverse the judgment and rule that the controller does not have the authority to audit these joint labor management trusts created in collective bargaining for the benefit of the employees represented by Local 18,” Heine said.
In March, Chalfant made a tentative ruling against D’Arcy.
Source: www.dailynews.com
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"LIke" Larry Elder on Facebook












No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement