Saturday, March 29, 2014

Civil Rights Movement -- ‘Southern Strategy’ vs. ‘Northern Strategy’ (Part 1)

President Lyndon B. Johnson signs the Civil Rights Act of 1964
By Larry Elder, Mar. 29, 2014

A big reason that blacks hate the GOP is that party’s alleged use -- during the ‘60s and beyond -- of the so-called “Southern Strategy.”

That is, the GOP supposedly made -- and many say continues to make -- both naked and subtle racial appeals to white racist voters: Vote for the GOP and we’ll promote policies to oppress blacks. Never mind that as a percentage of the party, more Republicans voted for the civil rights bill than did Democrats.

The author of the term “Southern Strategy,” Pat Buchanan, then a speechwriter for Richard Nixon, described his “strategy” very differently from that way today’s critics characterize it:

            "We would build our Republican Party,” Buchanan said at the time, “on a foundation of states' rights, human rights, small government and a strong national defense, and leave it to the ‘party of [Democratic Georgia Gov. Lester] Maddox, [1966 Democratic challenger against Spiro Agnew for Maryland Gov. George] Mahoney and [Democratic Alabama Gov. George] Wallace to squeeze the last ounces of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice.’”

Why do those offended by the “Southern Strategy” give a pass to the LBJ’s racist rationale for supporting the Civil Rights Act of 1964? These quotes are from “Inside The White House” by respected investigative journalist, Ronald Kessler:

“I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” -- Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air Force One

And:

“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference.” -- LBJ

Finally, Jim Crow could not have survived but for government-imposed de jure segregation. If all the rednecks wanted not to trade with blacks, why would there be a to need pass laws to make these racists do what they are all supposedly doing anyway?

This is from Thomas Sowell’s book, “Preferential Policies, An International Perspective”:


“Even after such Jim Crow laws were passed, the streetcar company in Mobile initially refused to comply, and in Montgomery it was reported in the early years that blacks simply continued to sit wherever they pleased. In Jacksonville, the streetcar company delayed enforcing the segregation seating law of 1901 until 1905. Georgia’s state law of 1891 segregating the races was ignored by the streetcar companies in Augusta until 1898, in Savannah until 1899, and in the latter city was not fully enforced until 1906. In Mobile, the streetcar company publicly refused to enforce the Jim Crow laws of 1902, until its streetcar conductors began to be arrested and fined for non-compliance with the law. In Tennessee, the streetcar company opposed the state legislation imposing Jim Crow seating in 1903, delayed enforcement after the law was passed, and eventually was able to get the state courts to declare it unconstitutional.”

Related:  The Elder Statement: Civil Rights Movement -- ‘Southern Strategy’ vs. ‘Northern Strategy’ (Part 2)


Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"LIke" Larry Elder on Facebook

2 comments:

  1. I have many elderly relatives living in the South... They were raised Democrat but in the 60's/70's they decided to change parties for the following reasons...1 They were embarrassed by the coverage of Southern Governors being so racist. (Their words, not mine). 2. Being church going Christians they despised the push to remove God, religion and prayer from public schools by liberals/Democrats. 3. The push for on demand abortion by liberals/Democrats. 4. Liberals/Democrats pushing Unions and Communism. Many liberals from the North promoting Unions literally carried signs promoting Communism. I've questioned them for years trying to get to the bottom of this myth of Suddenly the Southern Democrats joining the Republican party and becoming the racist party over night. I've come to the conclusion it's 100% BS, Democrat propaganda.

    ReplyDelete
  2. christopher_vall@yahoo.comMay 7, 2017 at 9:49 AM

    The irony of Democrats accusing Republicans of the "Southern Strategy" is that it forces them to acknowledge that racists voted Democrat because of Democratic racist policies, and racists refused to vote Republican because of Republican Civil Rights Policies. If Republicans were the party of Slavery, Jim Crow, and the KKK, then there would be no need for a "Strategy" to attract racist votes.

    Politics is ugly, anyone unaware of this is particularly naive. Occasionally, moral high ground is compromised to accomplish a more ambitious goal. This is the nature of democracy that all political parties are guilty of. Sometimes it may necessitate aligning with a morally ambiguous figure like Lee Atwater. It would be a mistake for a conservative to refuse to acknowledge this underbelly of our history, and it would jeopardize credibility to deny it outright. In an America where Democratic policies upheld slavery, instituted Jim Crow, founded the KKK, dispraportionately incentivized black women to become government dependent, encouraged black fathers to abandon their children, and disproportionally abort black babies; Barry Goldwater's "State's Right's" ideology is a tolerable blemish on the record of The Party of Lincoln.

    ReplyDelete

Comment Policy:

The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.

This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.

The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.

To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.

Thank you for your attention.

The Elder Statement