.png)
By Charlotte Alter, Mar. 25, 2014
The three
women of the Supreme Court dominated questioning at the beginning of Tuesday’s
oral arguments in a case pitting religious business owners against the new
health care reform law’s mandate that employer-provided insurance cover
contraceptive care.
The court
case will determine whether Hobby Lobby, a Christian-owned craft store chain,
and Conestoga Wood Specialties, a cabinet company, can be exempted from
providing contraception coverage to female employees through federally mandated
health insurance policies.
Supreme
Court proceedings make for notoriously difficult and unreliable predictors of
how justices might rule on a case. That said, Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena
Kagan, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg wasted no time in pressing the corporate
challengers, according to the Wall Street Journal‘s live blog of
the oral arguments.
Read the full story: www.time.com
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"Like" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement