.png)
Mar. 23, 2014, The Wall Street Journal
A defining feature of President Obama's second term is his
willfulness in defying limits on executive power to suit his political goals,
and no more so than with the Affordable Care Act. The judiciary is the last
check on those abuses, and this week it will have another opportunity to
vindicate the rule of law.
On
Tuesday the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear one of the more important
legal challenges to ObamaCare's lawless implementation. Unlike the challenge to
the individual insurance mandate, Halbig v. Sebelius involves no great
questions of constitutional interpretation. The plaintiffs are merely asking
the judges to tell the Administration to faithfully execute the plain language
of the statute that Congress passed and President Obama signed.
The Affordable Care Act—at least the version that passed in
2010—instructed the states to establish insurance exchanges, and if they didn't
the Health and Human Services Department was authorized to build federal
exchanges. The law says that subsidies will be available only to people who
enroll "through an Exchange established by the State." The question
in Halbig is whether these taxpayer subsidies can be distributed through
the federal exchanges, as the Administration insists.
Prior
to passage, Democrats were divided over the structure of the exchanges, with
liberals favoring a national clearinghouse and moderates state control. The
federalists won and conditioned the subsidies on state-based exchanges.
This
was no accident. The federal government cannot commandeer the sovereign states
under the Constitution, so Democrats created an incentive for Governors to
participate voluntarily.
Follow Larry Elder on Twitter
"LIke" Larry Elder on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy:
The author of this blog will attempt to engage in conversation via the comments section whenever possible and recognize the 24/7 nature of the internet. Moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular operational hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible, however admins and/or the author is unable to commit to replying to every comment posted.
This is a moderated blog. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, it is expected that participants will treat each other, as well as the author and admin, with respect. Comments that contain vulgar or abusive language; personal attacks of any kind will not be posted. Comments that are spam or that promote services or products will not be posted. It is requested that all comments remain on topic.
The Elder Statement blog does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this blog is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. The Elder Statement blog may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. The Elder Statement blog does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those Web sites that may be reached through links on our Web site.
To protect individual privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include phone numbers, addresses or email details in the body of a comment. Such information will result in removal of a comment.
Thank you for your attention.
The Elder Statement